Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1083323
Septic shock caused by pleural empyema: diagnostic and therapeutic approach
Septic shock caused by pleural empyema: diagnostic and therapeutic approach // Belgrade Anaesthesia Forum, Book of proceedings and abstracts
Beograd: „La-pressing“ – Lajkovac, 2020. str. 88-89 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, stručni)
CROSBI ID: 1083323 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Septic shock caused by pleural empyema: diagnostic
and therapeutic approach
Autori
Kristek, Gordana ; Kvolik, Slavica ; Kristek, Dalibor ; Nešković, Nenad ; Škiljić, Sonja ; Haršanji Drenjančević, Ivana
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, stručni
Izvornik
Belgrade Anaesthesia Forum, Book of proceedings and abstracts
/ - Beograd : „La-pressing“ – Lajkovac, 2020, 88-89
ISBN
978-86-89029-11-6
Skup
5th Belgrade Anaesthesia Forum
Mjesto i datum
Beograd, Srbija, 03.04.2020. - 05.04.2020
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
empyema, thoracic trauma, sepsis, septic shock
Sažetak
Introduction: Pleural empyema pertains to the presence of purulent contents in the pleural space, usually after infections or thoracic trauma. A septic shock is not a common presentation of empyema. Case description: A 53-year-old patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock and acute respiratory failure requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Anamnestic data revealed the right chest traumafive days ago. During the initial examination in the emergency room, the patient complained of an inability to breathe and chest pain and a chest radiograph showed large right-sided pleural effusion.Computed tomography (CT) revealed extensive pleural effusion on the right side. Chest tube drainage was performed, and the effusion appeared as a cloudy fluid consistent with pus. Due to the septic shock he was treated with volume replacement, continuous noradrenalin and vasopressin infusion, whereas mechanical ventilation using high oxygen concentration was used. The meropenem and linezolid for ten days followed with azithromycin for three days were given, even though blood cultures, tracheal aspirate, pleural effusion and urine were negative. This treatment allowed discontinuation of vasopressors and resulted in the decrease of both CRP and procalcitonin levels. On the seventeenth ICU day bronchoscopic specimens yielded Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and according to the antibiogram treatment with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole was started. The patient’s condition was rapidly improved, and one week later he was discharged from the ICU. Conclusions: Pleural empyema can lead to sepsis and septic shock and the correct diagnostic and therapeutic approach is crucial for patient survival.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Klinički bolnički centar Osijek,
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek
Profili:
Gordana Kristek
(autor)
Ivana Haršanji Drenjančević
(autor)
Nenad Nešković
(autor)
Slavica Kvolik
(autor)