Naslov
Objective liability in medicine: Yes or No?

Autori
Kačer, Hrvoje ; Kačer, Blanka

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
Medicina, pravo in družba, sodobni izzivi in dileme / Kraljić, Suzana ; Reberšek Gorišek, Jelka ; Rijavec, Vesna - Maribor : Pravna fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, 2018, 147-164

ISBN
978-961-286-147-6

Skup
27. posvetovanje: Medicina, pravo in družba, sodobni izzivi in dileme

Mjesto i datum
Maribor, Slovenija, 23.03.2018. - 24.03.2018

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Pozvano predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
guilt , guilt free, damage, no-fault compensation, jurisprudence

Sažetak
In this paper the authors dealt with, de lege lata and de lege ferenda, objective liability in medicine. They concluded that the real problem at hand is the issue of the very principled legislative-juridical framework (principally the one from Civil Obligations Act) for objective liability on one hand, the incredible advancement of medical science and devices that are used in providing medical services on the other, as well as the truly conservative jurisprudence. Unless the existing legal norms are changed, only the proper application of the law (which is still insufficiently present) will objective liability without a doubt be applied massively, without any guilt, because, except perhaps in primary health care, the use of dangerous things and/or dangerous activity is a rule rather than the exception. If that occurs or more precisely when this occurs, more bad consequences than good will arise and that should certainly be prevented. This specifically means within the medical laws that are lex specialis in relation to the Civil Obligations Act, that this general provision needs to be elaborated in detail, whether by way of exclusion or by way of imposition.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo

POVEZANOST RADA