Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1070341

Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews


Könsgen, Nadja; Barcot, Ognjen; Heß, Simone; Puljak, Livia; Goossen, Käthe; Rombey, Tanja; Pieper, Dawid
Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 120 (2020), 25-32 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1070341 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews

Autori
Könsgen, Nadja ; Barcot, Ognjen ; Heß, Simone ; Puljak, Livia ; Goossen, Käthe ; Rombey, Tanja ; Pieper, Dawid

Izvornik
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (0895-4356) 120 (2020); 25-32

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Cochrane reviews ; Inter-review agreement ; Kappa coefficient ; Methodology ; RCTs ; Risk of bias

Sažetak
Objectives: The objective of the study was to measure the level of agreement between Cochrane reviews of overlapping randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding risk-of-bias (RoB) judgments. Study design and setting: On November 5, 2017, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched for Cochrane reviews on tobacco. Reviews that included overlapping RCTs were included. RoB judgments were extracted from RoB tables using automated data scraping with manual verification and adjustments. Agreement between the reviews was calculated using Conger's generalized kappa coefficient (κ) and raw agreement (a). Results: We included 53 Cochrane reviews of 376 RCTs. For the RoB domain "random sequence generation, " the level of agreement between the reviews was substantial with κ = 0.63 (95% confidence interval: 0.56 to 0.71 ; a = 0.80). There was slight-to-moderate agreement between the reviews regarding the domains "allocation concealment": κ = 0.51 (0.41 to 0.61), a = 0.75 ; "blinding": κ = 0.19 (0.02 to 0.37), a = 0.52 ; "blinding of outcome assessment": κ = 0.43 (0.14 to 0.72) a = 0.67 ; and "incomplete outcome data": κ = 0.15 (-0.03 to 0.32), a = 0.64. For "blinding of participants and personnel" and "selective reporting", κ could not be calculated. The raw agreement was 0.40 and 0.42, respectively. Conclusion: The level of agreement between Cochrane reviews regarding RoB judgments ranged from slight to substantial depending on the RoB domain. Further investigations regarding reasons for variation and interventions to improve agreement are needed.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Ognjen Barčot (autor)

Avatar Url Livia Puljak (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Könsgen, Nadja; Barcot, Ognjen; Heß, Simone; Puljak, Livia; Goossen, Käthe; Rombey, Tanja; Pieper, Dawid
Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 120 (2020), 25-32 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Könsgen, N., Barcot, O., Heß, S., Puljak, L., Goossen, K., Rombey, T. & Pieper, D. (2020) Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 120, 25-32 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016.
@article{article, author = {K\"{o}nsgen, Nadja and Barcot, Ognjen and Heß, Simone and Puljak, Livia and Goossen, K\"{a}the and Rombey, Tanja and Pieper, Dawid}, year = {2020}, pages = {25-32}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016}, keywords = {Cochrane reviews, Inter-review agreement, Kappa coefficient, Methodology, RCTs, Risk of bias}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016}, volume = {120}, issn = {0895-4356}, title = {Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews}, keyword = {Cochrane reviews, Inter-review agreement, Kappa coefficient, Methodology, RCTs, Risk of bias} }
@article{article, author = {K\"{o}nsgen, Nadja and Barcot, Ognjen and Heß, Simone and Puljak, Livia and Goossen, K\"{a}the and Rombey, Tanja and Pieper, Dawid}, year = {2020}, pages = {25-32}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016}, keywords = {Cochrane reviews, Inter-review agreement, Kappa coefficient, Methodology, RCTs, Risk of bias}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.016}, volume = {120}, issn = {0895-4356}, title = {Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews}, keyword = {Cochrane reviews, Inter-review agreement, Kappa coefficient, Methodology, RCTs, Risk of bias} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font