Pretraga

Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1070324

Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey

Rombey, Tanja; Puljak, Livia; Allers, Katharina; Ruano, Juan; Pieper, Dawid
Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 123 (2020), 9-17 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)

CROSBI ID: 1070324 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey

Autori
Rombey, Tanja ; Puljak, Livia ; Allers, Katharina ; Ruano, Juan ; Pieper, Dawid

Izvornik
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (0895-4356) 123 (2020); 9-17

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Methodological research ; PROSPERO ; Protocol ; Registration ; Survey ; Systematic review

Sažetak
Objectives: This study aimed to explore views of authors of systematic reviews (SRs) registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) toward publishing SR protocols as peer-reviewed articles. Study design and setting: Contact persons of all PROSPERO records for non-Cochrane SRs registered in 2018 (N = 12, 531) were invited to participate in an anonymous 5-minute online survey that was administered through SurveyMonkey. The main question addressed SR authors' views toward publishing SR protocols as peer-reviewed articles. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: In total, 4, 223 (33.7%) of 12, 531 invitees responded, of which 3, 739 (88.5%) completed the survey. Almost half of the international respondents had published or planned to publish a protocol for the SR described in their PROSPERO record as a peer- reviewed article (1, 811/4, 054 ; 44.7%). Most respondents agreed that publishing a protocol in a peer-reviewed journal increases SR quality as reviewers get external feedback from peer reviewers (2, 899/3, 739 ; 77.5%) but at the same time agreed that it is not necessary if the SR is registered in PROSPERO (2, 399/3, 739 ; 64.2%). Conclusion: SR authors seem to have inconsistent views toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles, and many seem to consider registration in PROSPERO (without peer review) sufficient. Hence, awareness about the benefits of publishing protocols as a peer- reviewed article in addition to registration in PROSPERO should be raised.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita



POVEZANOST RADA

Ustanove:
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Livia Puljak (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Rombey, Tanja; Puljak, Livia; Allers, Katharina; Ruano, Juan; Pieper, Dawid
Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 123 (2020), 9-17 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Rombey, T., Puljak, L., Allers, K., Ruano, J. & Pieper, D. (2020) Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 123, 9-17 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010.
@article{article, author = {Rombey, Tanja and Puljak, Livia and Allers, Katharina and Ruano, Juan and Pieper, Dawid}, year = {2020}, pages = {9-17}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010}, keywords = {Methodological research, PROSPERO, Protocol, Registration, Survey, Systematic review}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010}, volume = {123}, issn = {0895-4356}, title = {Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey}, keyword = {Methodological research, PROSPERO, Protocol, Registration, Survey, Systematic review} }
@article{article, author = {Rombey, Tanja and Puljak, Livia and Allers, Katharina and Ruano, Juan and Pieper, Dawid}, year = {2020}, pages = {9-17}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010}, keywords = {Methodological research, PROSPERO, Protocol, Registration, Survey, Systematic review}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.010}, volume = {123}, issn = {0895-4356}, title = {Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer- reviewed articles: an international survey}, keyword = {Methodological research, PROSPERO, Protocol, Registration, Survey, Systematic review} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE

Citati:

    Altmetrijski pokazatelji:


    Podijeli:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font
    CROSBI koristi kolačiće (cookies) kako bi poboljšao funkcionalnost stranice.