Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1070269
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial // Trials, 21 (2020), 1; 426-436 doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04360-9 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1070269 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of blogshots with plain language
summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a
qualitative study and randomized trial
Autori
Buljan, Ivan ; Tokalić, Ružica ; Roguljić, Marija ; Zakarija-Grković, Irena ; Vrdoljak, Davorka ; Milić, Petra ; Puljak, Livia ; Marušić, Ana
Izvornik
Trials (1745-6215) 21
(2020), 1;
426-436
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Evidence-based medicine ; Health communication ; Medical decision making ; Patient education
Sažetak
Background: Cochrane, an organization dedicated to the production and dissemination of high- quality evidence on health, endeavors to reach consumers by developing appropriate summary formats of its systematic reviews. However, the optimal type of presentation of evidence to consumers is still unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate consumer preferences for different summary formats of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs), using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Methods: Initially, we conducted three focus groups with medical students (n = 7), doctors (n = 4), and patients (n = 9) in 2017 to explore their health information search habits and preferences for CSR summary formats. Based on those findings, we conducted a randomized trial with medical students at the University of Split School of Medicine, Croatia, and with patients from three Dalmatian family practices to determine whether they prefer CSR blogshots (n = 115) or CSR plain language summaries (PLSs ; n = 123). Results: Participants in the focus groups favored brief and explicit CSR summary formats with fewer numbers. Although we found no difference in participants' preferences for a specific summary format in the overall sample, subgroup analysis showed that patients preferred blogshots over PLSs in comparison to medical students (P = 0.003, eta squared effect size η2 = 0.04). Conclusion: CSR summaries should be produced in a format that meets the expectations and needs of consumers. Use of blogshots as a summary format could enhance the dissemination of CSRs among patients. Trial registration: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03542201. Registered on May 31st 2018.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb
Profili:
Irena Zakarija-Grković (autor)
Davorka Vrdoljak (autor)
Ružica Tokalić (autor)
Marija Roguljić (autor)
Ana Marušić (autor)
Livia Puljak (autor)
Ivan Buljan (autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE