Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1061851
The role of luteal support during IVF: a qualitative systematic review
The role of luteal support during IVF: a qualitative systematic review // Gynecological endocrinology, 35 (2019), 10; 829-834 doi:10.1080/09513590.2019.1603288 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1061851 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The role of luteal support during IVF: a
qualitative systematic review
Autori
Tomic, Vlatka ; Kasum, Miro ; Vucic, Katarina
Izvornik
Gynecological endocrinology (0951-3590) 35
(2019), 10;
829-834
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
IVF/ICSI cycles ; Progesterone ; infertility ; luteal phase support ; ovarian stimulation
Sažetak
The aim of this review is to provide qualitative evidence-based synthesis regarding efficacy of luteal-phase support on fertility outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with respect to clinical or live birth rates and pregnancy loss rates. Although the need of luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles is well- known, the optimal start, dosage, route and the duration of the luteal phase support is still subject of debate. Data suggest that the optimal period to start with the luteal phase support would be between 24–72 hours after oocyte- retrieval and should continue at least until a positive pregnancy test is achieved. However, the majority of IVF-centers worldwide provide progesterone support up to 8 weeks of pregnancy. Among the well-established routes of luteal support, oral dydrogesterone and subcutaneous progesterone represent new and interesting routes of progesterone administration. The current studies support these routes of progesterone administration use in terms of comparable pregnancy rates and pregnancy loss rates to vaginal and intramuscular progesterone. Furthermore, the acceptance and tolerability among patients seems to be even better. In the frozen-thawed embryo transfer, dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone are not effective as monotherapy treatments ; however, when combined there is no reason to avoid one or the other in this setting.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb