Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1057614
Operative versus non-operative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children: systematic review and meta-analysis
Operative versus non-operative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children: systematic review and meta-analysis // Injury, 52 (2020), suppl. 5; S49-S57 doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.035 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1057614 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Operative versus non-operative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autori
Kopljar, Mario ; Ivandić, Stjepan ; Mesić, Marko ; Bakota, Bore ; Žiger, Tihomil ; Kondža, Goran ; Pavić, Roman ; Milan, Milošević ; Čoklo, Miran
Izvornik
Injury (0020-1383) 52
(2020), Suppl. 5;
S49-S57
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
abdominal trauma ; children ; pancreatic injury ; pancreatic trauma
Sažetak
AIM: Blunt abdominal trauma is the major cause of abdominal injury in children. No clear guidelines exist for the initial management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of initially non-operative versus initially operative treatment in children with blunt pancreatic injury. METHODS: Studies including children (<18 years) with blunt pancreatic injuries published in any language after year 1990 were included. Total of 849 studies were identified by searching PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Database. After review, 42 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. There were 1754 patients, of whom 1095 were initially managed non-operatively (NOM), and 659 operatively (OM). Primary outcome was non-operative management success rate, and secondary outcomes were mortality, complications (including specifically pseudocysts and pancreatic fistulas), percent of patients and days on total parenteral nutrition (TPN), length of hospital stay and readmissions. RESULTS: There was no difference in mortality between NOM and OM groups. The incidence of pseudocysts was significantly higher in NOM group compared to OM (P<0.001), especially for AAST grade III or higher (P<0.00001). Overall incidence of pancreatic fistulas was significantly lower for NOM group (p = 0.02) but no difference was observed for AAST grades III or higher (p = 0.49). There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (P = 0.31). Duration of total parenteral nutrition was not different for all AAST grades (P = 0.35), but was significantly shorter for OM group for AAST grades III and higher (p = 0.0001). There was no overall difference in readmissions (P = 0.94). Overall success rate of initial non-operative treatment was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with pancreatic trauma can initially be treated non-operatively, while early surgical treatment may benefit patients with lesions of the main pancreatic duct. ERCP offers both highly accurate diagnosis and potential treatment of ductal injuries. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Klinički bolnički centar Osijek,
KBC "Sestre Milosrdnice",
Institut za antropologiju,
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek,
Klinika za dječje bolesti,
Fakultet za dentalnu medicinu i zdravstvo, Osijek
Profili:
Goran Kondža
(autor)
Milan Milošević
(autor)
Miran Čoklo
(autor)
Roman Pavić
(autor)
Tihomil Žiger
(autor)
Mario Kopljar
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE