Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1025436
Careful preoperative planning of aortic valve surgery – impact of echocardiography and CT parameters
Careful preoperative planning of aortic valve surgery – impact of echocardiography and CT parameters // Cardiologia croatica, 14 (2019), 9-10
Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 2019. str. 228-228 doi:10.15836/ccar2019.228 (poster, recenziran, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1025436 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Careful preoperative planning of aortic valve surgery – impact of echocardiography and CT
parameters
Autori
Varvodić, Josip ; Šušnjar, Dubravka ; Jurin, Ivana ; Grgurić, Jasenka ; Starčević, Boris ; Paić, Frane ; Rudež, Igor
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Cardiologia croatica, 14 (2019), 9-10
/ - , 2019, 228-228
Skup
6th Cardiology highlights the european society of cardiology update meeting
Mjesto i datum
Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 17.10.2019. - 20.10.2019
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Recenziran
Ključne riječi
aortic valve surgery ; CT ; Ca score
Sažetak
Objective: We can observe an increase in incidence and prevalence of patients with aortic valve stenosis in the general population. The gold standard in aortic valve therapy is aortic valve replacement. Preoperative planning is essential for good outcomes, as the severity of stenosis and calcifications can sometimes be extremely progressive and even involve the aortic root and ascending aorta. There is not enough research on comparation of CT scan analysis of aortic valve stenosis and echocardiography which is the golden standard of disease diagnosis.1-3 Patients and Methods: We have analyzed 88 patients [age: 70.01±9.066 (mean±SD) ; female: n=45, 51.1%]. Among the patients, 12 had bicuspid aortic valve leaflet structure while the rest of the patients (n=76, 86.4%) exhibited TAV stenosis. Degree of aortic stenosis was assessed according to mean pressure gradient (MPG), peak pressure gradient (PPG), aortic valve area (AVA) indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) and maximum speed through aortic valve (Vmax). These were compared with calcium score (AVCS) calculated from CT scan. All of these patients were observed in the operating room during surgery and valves analyzed after explantation. All of the patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Results: Average AVCS values (median + IQ range) were 3306.3 (1995.4 – 4820.6) [female: 2215 (1463.35 – 3372.85) ; male: 4093.5 (3133.3 – 5274.4). Average AVCS values for BAV patients were 3063.5 (3323.125 – 4868.9) and 3106.55 (1965.375) – 4780.125) for TAV patients. There were significant correlations between AVCS and AVAi (Spearman’s ρ=−0.24, P=0.025), PPG (ρ= 0.38, P< 0.001), MPG (ρ= 0.36, P= 0.001) V max (ρ= 0.37, P < 0.001) and gender (ρ= 0.485, P < 0.001) while AVA values showed no significant correlation with AVCS (ρ= -0.066, P = 0.540). Overall survival was similar not depending of severity of calcifications and stenosis, however clamp time and surgery time were longer for patients with severely calcified valves which means calcium scoring as a parameter should also be taken in consideration during preoperative planning. Conclusion: Careful preoperative planning is essential for good outcome of surgery, here we have proven the connection between echocardiography parameters of aortic stenosis and calcium score calculated by CT scan.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinička bolnica "Dubrava"