Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1015504

Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure?


Ražov Radas, Melanija
Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure? // 17th Euroasian Congress of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Surgery: Book of Abstracts
Split, Hrvatska, 2019. str. 15-15 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1015504 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure?

Autori
Ražov Radas, Melanija

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
17th Euroasian Congress of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Surgery: Book of Abstracts / - , 2019, 15-15

Skup
17th Euroasian Congress of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Surgery

Mjesto i datum
Split, Hrvatska, 29.03.2019. - 30.03.2019

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
ERUS ; PH diagnosis ; colorectal cancer ; sensitivity ; surgical procedure

Sažetak
Background: A number of patients who are suffernig from colorectal cancer is increasing worldwide. This study attempted to demonstrate the benefit of endoscopic rectal ultrasound scan (ERUS) of anorectal area in patients with cancer on decision for therapeutic approach and type of surgical procedure. Aldo, we compared ERUS with postoperative pathohistological tumor staging. Methods: In 40 patients with endoscopyc and pathohistological (PH) diagnosis of rectal cancer ERUS was performed to determine the extent of the disease, which was subsequently compared with postoperative pathohistological findings. 26 patienst continue the study. Results: After ERUS examination, there where three responders in group Tis (T0), five in group T1, twelve in group T2, seventeen in group T3, two in group T4 and one of responders had extraluminal carcinoma. After selection within patients, we compared 26 ERUS findings with pathohistological diagnosis, to determine sensitivity and accuracy of ERUS. Patients who provided chemoteraphy and irradiation procol before surgery were excluded from study. The total sensitivity of the ERUS in preoperative staging, for tumor in stage T0-T4 was 96%. Accuracy was 89%. Conclusions: This research has shown that the surgeon can rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding of type of surgical procedure for T0-T2, and even T3 staging rectal cancer. This does not minimize the importance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but simplifies the procedure for the patient. MRI would remain the gold standard for T4 staging of rectal cancer.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Sveučilište u Zadru,
Opća bolnica Zadar

Profili:

Avatar Url Melanija Ražov Radas (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Ražov Radas, Melanija
Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure? // 17th Euroasian Congress of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Surgery: Book of Abstracts
Split, Hrvatska, 2019. str. 15-15 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
Ražov Radas, M. (2019) Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure?. U: 17th Euroasian Congress of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Surgery: Book of Abstracts.
@article{article, author = {Ra\v{z}ov Radas, Melanija}, year = {2019}, pages = {15-15}, keywords = {ERUS, PH diagnosis, colorectal cancer, sensitivity, surgical procedure}, title = {Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure?}, keyword = {ERUS, PH diagnosis, colorectal cancer, sensitivity, surgical procedure}, publisherplace = {Split, Hrvatska} }
@article{article, author = {Ra\v{z}ov Radas, Melanija}, year = {2019}, pages = {15-15}, keywords = {ERUS, PH diagnosis, colorectal cancer, sensitivity, surgical procedure}, title = {Endoscopic rectal ultrasound in staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparison with patohistological postoperative diagnose. Can the surgeon rely on a finding of an endoscopist before deciding on the type of surgical procedure?}, keyword = {ERUS, PH diagnosis, colorectal cancer, sensitivity, surgical procedure}, publisherplace = {Split, Hrvatska} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font