Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 993161

THE TRUST IS NOT BLIND – REVIEWING THE IDEA OF MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION AND NE BIS IN IDEM PRINCIPLE


Munivrana Vajda, Maja
THE TRUST IS NOT BLIND – REVIEWING THE IDEA OF MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION AND NE BIS IN IDEM PRINCIPLE // EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES SERIES / Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica (ur.).
Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2018. str. 323-337 doi:10.25234/eclic/7115 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


Naslov
THE TRUST IS NOT BLIND – REVIEWING THE IDEA OF MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION AND NE BIS IN IDEM PRINCIPLE
(THE TRUST IS NOT BLIND – REVIEWING THE IDEA OF MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU IN THE CONTEXT OF CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION)

Autori
Munivrana Vajda, Maja

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES SERIES / Duić, Dunja ; Petrašević, Tunjica - Osijek : Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2018, 323-337

ISBN
978-953-8109-25-6

Skup
EU LAW IN CONTEXT – ADJUSTMENT TO MEMBERSHIP AND CHALLENGES OF THE ENLARGEMENT

Mjesto i datum
Osijek, Hrvatska, 14-15.06.2018

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Positive conflicts of jurisdiction, extraterritorial jurisdiction, ne bis in idem, parallel proceedings, mutual trust, AFSJ

Sažetak
This paper will deal with the positive conflicts of jurisdiction in the EU. At the outset, as an introduction, it will seek to identify the reasons which may lead to positive conflicts of jurisdiction in the EU and explain why such conflicts may create problems on different levels ; foremost for concerned individuals, who may face prosecutions in different states, but also for the efficiency of judiciary of the member states and the rule of law in the EU. The existing legal framework has so far remained unsuccessful in addressing this issue, although several initiatives have tried to provide some guiding principles and solutions aimed at avoiding positive conflicts within the joint Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Despite these efforts, to date the only binding mechanism which can conclusively settle conflicts of jurisdictions in the EU is the ne bis in idem principle. The issue of ne bis in idem has received a lot of scholarly attention, so the purpose of this paper is not to analyze the transnational application of ne bis in idem principle in detail, as this has been done elsewhere, but to look at the most recent decisions of the CJEU. Some of these decisions cast doubt on the idea of mutual trust on which this principle lies. Furthermore, this mechanism is far from perfect and there are many problems surrounding its application, indicating that conflicts of jurisdiction should be solved in another, more principled and forward looking manner. The paper will conclude with the set of proposals for preventing and solving conflicts of jurisdictions and assessment of their viability.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Pravo



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekt / tema
HRZZ-IP-2013-11-8282 - Hrvatska pravosudna suradnja u kaznenim stvarima u Europskoj uniji i regiji: nasljeđe prošlosti i izazovi budućnosti

Ustanove
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb

Autor s matičnim brojem:
Maja Munivrana Vajda, (265006)

Časopis indeksira:


  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities (CPCI-SSH)


Citati