Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 987383

An-Arché as the Voice of the People: Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Disagreement


Paić, Žarko
An-Arché as the Voice of the People: Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Disagreement // International Journal of Philosophy, 7 (2019), 1; 1-16 doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20190701.11 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


Naslov
An-Arché as the Voice of the People: Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Disagreement

Autori
Paić, Žarko

Izvornik
International Journal of Philosophy (2330-7439) 7 (2019), 1; 1-16

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
An-arché, Oligarchy, Democracy, Disagreement

Sažetak
An-arché in the thinking of politics and aesthetics beyond the tradition of "political philosophy" of Leo Strauss and Hannah Arendt in 20. century, or in contact with the ideas of political emancipation by Joseph Jacotot, and Karl Marx and anarchism, marks the theory of politics as a disagreement (mésentente) in the writings of Jacques Rancière. The intention of this text is to show how and in what way the thinking of the political should confront to the philosophy of politics who always take care theoretically about the politics of norms, postulates and rules of action. Since Rancière believes that political preceded by politics as a police or regime of the oligarchic law in contemporary liberal democracies, and it should be a matter of radical equality among citizens, then it is the fundamental problem of determining politics in an attempt to think of an-arché. In this contingency, we are doomed to a constant struggle with the order of inequalities and chaos in its own vagueness. That must be a reason why we use the word "mysticism" for what comes out of the state in- between two ways of comprehending a politics: (1) as the power of a hierarchically predicated society on which a state is constructed and (2) as a spontaneous struggle for democracy. The true politics of the equality must face what lies in its own bargain. And that is the powerful and chaotic an-arché. The paradox and aporia are not that democracy and freedom are derived from this principle without principles. Anyway, the scandal that rules in neoliberal oligarchy represents a confirmation of the same an-arché. For this reason, its archi-politics, para-politics and meta-politics are "the cunning of reason" of a perverted order of the world where the power of the "police" sets limits to the "politics" of freedom and not vice versa. Contemporary oligarchy is based in this an-arché-ic model of chaos and ambiguity in all its visible and invisible areas of action, from the management of the economy to marketing policy. But the problem with Rancière's metapolitics has been seen from the beginning to be a problem of the impossibility of political without the articulation of power. Equality without power remains unfulfilled by the demands of the "people" as temporary demos.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Politologija, Filozofija, Interdisciplinarne humanističke znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove
Tekstilno-tehnološki fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Žarko Paić (autor)

Citiraj ovu publikaciju

Paić, Žarko
An-Arché as the Voice of the People: Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Disagreement // International Journal of Philosophy, 7 (2019), 1; 1-16 doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20190701.11 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Paić, Ž. (2019) An-Arché as the Voice of the People: Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Disagreement. International Journal of Philosophy, 7 (1), 1-16 doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20190701.11.
@article{article, author = {Pai\'{c}, \v{Z}.}, year = {2019}, pages = {1-16}, DOI = {10.11648/j.ijp.20190701.11}, keywords = {An-arch\'{e}, Oligarchy, Democracy, Disagreement}, journal = {International Journal of Philosophy}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20190701.11}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, issn = {2330-7439}, title = {An-Arch\'{e} as the Voice of the People: Jacques Ranci\`{e}re and the Politics of Disagreement}, keyword = {An-arch\'{e}, Oligarchy, Democracy, Disagreement} }

Citati