Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective (CROSBI ID 258756)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Drvenica, Ivana ; Bravo, Giangiacomo ; Vejmelka, Lucija ; Dekanski, Aleksandar ; Nedić, Olgica Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective // Publications / MDPI, 7 (2018), 1; 1, 10. doi: 10.3390/publications7010001

Podaci o odgovornosti

Drvenica, Ivana ; Bravo, Giangiacomo ; Vejmelka, Lucija ; Dekanski, Aleksandar ; Nedić, Olgica

engleski

Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective

The aim of this study was to investigate the opinion of authors on the overall quality and effectiveness of reviewers’ contributions to reviewed papers. We employed an on-line survey of thirteen journals which publish articles in the field of life, social or technological sciences. Responses received from 193 authors were analysed using a mixed-effects model in order to determine factors deemed the most important in the authors’ evaluation of the reviewers. Qualitative content analysis of the responses to open questions was performed as well. The mixed-effects model revealed that the authors’ assessment of the competence of referees strongly depended on the final editorial decision and that the speed of the review process was influential as well. In Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) analysis on seven questions detailing authors’ opinions, perception of review speed remained a significant predictor of the assessment. In addition, both the perceived competence and helpfulness of the reviewers significantly and positively affected the authors’ evaluation. New models were used to re-check the value of these two factors and it was confirmed that the assessment of the competence of reviewers strongly depended on the final editorial decision.

reviewers’ reports ; authors’ opinion ; on-line survey ; mixed-effect model ; content analysis

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

7 (1)

2018.

1

10

objavljeno

2304-6775

10.3390/publications7010001

Povezanost rada

Interdisciplinarne društvene znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost