Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 972777

Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments?


Blečić, Martina
Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments? // Croatian journal of philosophy, 18 (2018), 53; 335-350 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 972777 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments?

Autori
Blečić, Martina

Izvornik
Croatian journal of philosophy (1333-1108) 18 (2018), 53; 335-350

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Conversational implicature, indirect communication, arguments, argumentation, communicational responsibility, justification, rationality

Sažetak
I suggest that the idea that conversational implicatures express argument can be significant for the notion of communicational responsibility. This underlying argument should be included in the reconstruction of conversational implicatures as a justification for the belief formed by the hearer on the basis of indirect communication. What makes this argument specific is the fact that its only explicit element is the speaker’s utterance taken as its initial premise. In order to reconstruct all the other elements, the hearer has to take into consideration factors such as the context and general knowledge of the shared language and the world. As the reconstruction of conversational implicatures in general, the reconstruction of implicatures as arguments is only potential. It is proposed that we should consider conversational implicatures as reason- giving arguments in which the speaker (arguer) addresses a hearer who does not need to reply. In those cases, the speaker is not trying to convince the hearer to accept his position but is explicitly stating a reason in support of his intended message. I believe that this approach can strengthen the idea of the speaker’s communicational responsibility for an implicated message even in the case when he wants to distance himself from it.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Filozofija



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
HRZZ-IP-2016-06-2408 - Racionalnost: između logičkog ideala i svakodnevnog zaključivanja (RACIO) (Smokrović, Nenad, HRZZ - 2016-06) ( POIROT)

Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka

Profili:

Avatar Url Martina Blečić (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju

Blečić, Martina
Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments? // Croatian journal of philosophy, 18 (2018), 53; 335-350 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Blečić, M. (2018) Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments?. Croatian journal of philosophy, 18 (53), 335-350.
@article{article, author = {Ble\v{c}i\'{c}, M.}, year = {2018}, pages = {335-350}, keywords = {Conversational implicature, indirect communication, arguments, argumentation, communicational responsibility, justification, rationality}, journal = {Croatian journal of philosophy}, volume = {18}, number = {53}, issn = {1333-1108}, title = {Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments?}, keyword = {Conversational implicature, indirect communication, arguments, argumentation, communicational responsibility, justification, rationality} }
@article{article, author = {Ble\v{c}i\'{c}, M.}, year = {2018}, pages = {335-350}, keywords = {Conversational implicature, indirect communication, arguments, argumentation, communicational responsibility, justification, rationality}, journal = {Croatian journal of philosophy}, volume = {18}, number = {53}, issn = {1333-1108}, title = {Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments?}, keyword = {Conversational implicature, indirect communication, arguments, argumentation, communicational responsibility, justification, rationality} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus





Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font