engleski

Differences in the effects of the same kinesiological content measured in two different ways

In kinesiologic education, diagnostics have a very special place in planning and programming the exercise content, but also monitoring the effects of the work. The exercise intensity expressed through the heart rate measurements is mainly measured manually (palpaction) and during measurement there is a possibility of measuring error especially if it is measurer inexperienced or insufficiently trained. This may result in inaccurate measurement results, so the purpose of this paper is to compare the results of heart rate measurement during performing the same workout content on physical education lesson measured by palpation and heart rate monitors for the purpose of determining differences insaid measurement methods. In this research were participated by 34 female students of the 2nd year of the Faculty of Teacher Education of the University of Zagreb. The values of heart rate during the performance of the polygon obstacles were monitored by a heart monitor. Their results were compared with the results of the same polygon that were measured manually (palpation) in a previous study, whose sample consisted of the female students of the 1st and 2nd year of the Faculty of Teacher Education University of Zagreb (N = 103). Well trained measurers can safely measure HR by manual technique (palpation) as demonstrated by the t - test results in this study where no statistically significant differences were found in the results HR measured with palpation and measurement results with heart monitors.

female students, palpation, heart rate, heart rate monitor

nije evidentirano