Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Why do we need to think of ethics? Development of reviewer and author guiedlines in Annual of social work (CROSBI ID 654761)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Švenda-Radeljak, Ksenija ; Vejmelka, Lucija ; Buljevac, Marko Why do we need to think of ethics? Development of reviewer and author guiedlines in Annual of social work // PUBMET 2017 : book of abstracts / Stojanovski, Jadranka (ur.). Zadar: Sveučilište u Zadru, 2017. str. 43-43

Podaci o odgovornosti

Švenda-Radeljak, Ksenija ; Vejmelka, Lucija ; Buljevac, Marko

engleski

Why do we need to think of ethics? Development of reviewer and author guiedlines in Annual of social work

Due to the active editorial policy, journal „Annual of Social Work“ recently redefined authors' and reviewers' guidelines. This process included several steps ; first step was the analysis of the guidelines in similar prospective scientific journals, which resulted in draft document including main issues important for the authors and reviewers collaborating with „Annual of Social Work“. In the second step, the draft was presented and discussed at the editorial board meeting. After receiving the suggestions of the editorial board, the document was revised and sent for the review to the expert in scientific publishing. The last step included finalizing the document and sending it for copying, editing and translation. Lastly, it was presented to authors and reviewers, and published at the web page of the journal „ Annual of Social Work”. Ethical questions are significant part of the guidelines, including editorial ethics, but also ethics in presenting the research findings. As the research in the field of social sciences are often conducted with people, sometimes with vulnerable groups, ethical questions should be considered in research design and ethical standards should be carefully set to minimize the risk of interfering with the research. Online research that focused on ethical questions was conducted with editorial board members of eight journals published by the Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb. The research was done via web survey and the results were interpreted using content analysis. The research findings will reveal the attitude of editorial board members towards ethical questions raised during the evaluation of articles published in the journals within the field of social sciences.

Scientific publication, ethical guidelines, review process, editorial role, social sciences

Međunarodni skup

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

43-43.

2017.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

PUBMET 2017 : book of abstracts

Stojanovski, Jadranka

Zadar: Sveučilište u Zadru

978-953-331-166-1

Podaci o skupu

PUBMET 2017: The 4th international conference on Scholarly Publishing in the Context of Open Science

poster

21.09.2017-22.09.2017

Zagreb, Hrvatska

Povezanost rada

Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti, Socijalne djelatnosti