Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Quality Assessment of a Mentoring Proccess during PhD program at Faculty of Medicine Osijek (CROSBI ID 653311)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Jakab, Jelena ; Kuna, Lucija ; Ivandić, Marul ; Smolić, Martina ; Včev, Aleksandar. Quality Assessment of a Mentoring Proccess during PhD program at Faculty of Medicine Osijek // Program and abstract book: 12th ORPHEUS Conference: PhD Training in Health Sciences and Biomedicine from the Interdisciplinary Perspective / Strukcinskiene, Birute (ur.). Klaipeda: Klaipedos universiteto leidykla, 2017. str. 57-58

Podaci o odgovornosti

Jakab, Jelena ; Kuna, Lucija ; Ivandić, Marul ; Smolić, Martina ; Včev, Aleksandar.

engleski

Quality Assessment of a Mentoring Proccess during PhD program at Faculty of Medicine Osijek

Introduction: Postgraduate Doctoral Study of Biomedicine and Health represents the highest level of education at the Faculty of Medicine Osijek. Effective mentoring is a critical determinant of success in the world of academic medicine. Despite a growing body of research there is a lack of clarity about the characteristics and outcomes of mentorship. Furthermore, there are different tools available to measure the effectiveness of the mentorship in the health care. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and students' satisfaction with their mentors at the PhD program of Biomedicine and Health at the Faculty of Medicine Osijek (Croatia). Matherials and methods: A total of 36 PhD students at the Faculty of Medicine Osijek filled an anonymous online Mentorship Evaluation Questionnaire covering 7 behavioral characteristics of their mentors. Students were asked to indicate their level of agreement with each statement along the Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Results: The majority of students strongly agreed (68.6 %) or agreed (20 %) with the claim that mentor is available, and shows interest and understanding. Most of them (75 %) confirmed that their mentor provides valuable information and ensures financial support for scientific research. Two-thirds of students reported that their mentor encourages them to improve in fulfilling their students' obligations. The vast majority of students (86.1 %) strongly agreed or agreed that behavior and attitude of their mentor is an example of professionalism. Conclusion: Results of our study showed that Phd students at the Faculty of Medicine Osijek are generally satisfied with their mentors and report that mentor is helpful to them across a number of important aspects of postgraduate and professional development.

mentorship ; PhD study ; quality assessment

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

57-58.

2017.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Program and abstract book: 12th ORPHEUS Conference: PhD Training in Health Sciences and Biomedicine from the Interdisciplinary Perspective

Strukcinskiene, Birute

Klaipeda: Klaipedos universiteto leidykla

978-9955-18-945-9

Podaci o skupu

12th International ORPHEUS Conference PhD Training in Health Sciences and Biomedicine from the Interdisciplinary Perspective

predavanje

01.01.2017-01.01.2017

Klaipėda, Litva

Povezanost rada

nije evidentirano