Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Nursing Students’ Expectations and Evaluations of Mentors’ Competences and Mentors’ Self- Evaluations as Indicators of Mentoring Process Quality (CROSBI ID 242449)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad

Lovrić, Robert ; Prlić, Nada ; Barać, Ivana ; Radić Radivoje Nursing Students’ Expectations and Evaluations of Mentors’ Competences and Mentors’ Self- Evaluations as Indicators of Mentoring Process Quality // American journal of nursing science, 6 (2017), 5; 382-386. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20170605.12

Podaci o odgovornosti

Lovrić, Robert ; Prlić, Nada ; Barać, Ivana ; Radić Radivoje

engleski

Nursing Students’ Expectations and Evaluations of Mentors’ Competences and Mentors’ Self- Evaluations as Indicators of Mentoring Process Quality

Important information about the clinical education can be revealed by nursing students’ initial expectations and final evaluation of mentors’ competences, and mentor’s self- evaluation of their competences. The aim of this study was to examine whether these constructs can be used for evaluating the atmosphere in clinical education. This was a nonexperimental prospective study. Data were collected between January and April 2012, in 12 clinics at the University Hospital Osijek. The participants were undergraduate nursing students in years 1, 2, and 3 (n = 150) and their mentors (n = 35) at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, during the academic year of 2012/2013. The instrument was a modified version of the questionnaire taken from The Nursing Clinical Teacher Effectiveness Inventory (NCTEI). Prior to clinical practice, the students evaluated the desirability of each competence expected from a mentor ; after the clinical practice, the students estimated how often their mentor possessed and applied those competences. Mentors have evaluated their own competences according to the same items. Comparison of students’ expectations and estimates shows significantly higher expectations of first and third year students (p<0.001). Mentors’ self-assessed competences, compared to students' evaluations, were rated significantly higher by mentors of all three years (p<0, 001). The comparison of nursing students’ initial expectations and final evaluation of mentors’ competences, and mentor’s self-evaluation of their competences, when they are significantly different, can provide relevant information about potential problem in clinical education.

Nurse ; Mentoring ; Evaluation ; Quality Indicators

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

6 (5)

2017.

382-386

objavljeno

2328-5745

10.11648/j.ajns.20170605.12

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice