engleski

Scholarly publishing and open science

According to the article published by Belluz, Plumer and Resnick in 2016 (https://www.vox.com/2016/7/14/12016710/science- challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process) and the survey of 270 scientists academia has a huge money problem, too many studies are poorly designed, replicating results is crucial — and rare, peer review is broken, too much science is locked behind paywalls, science is poorly communicated, and life as a young academic is incredibly stressful. We are discussing this statements in the context of the benefits of open science.

scholarly publishing ; open science

nije evidentirano