Can we really use available scales for child and adolescent psychopathology across cultures? A systematic review of cross-cultural measurement invariance data (CROSBI ID 237487)
Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija
Podaci o odgovornosti
Stevanović, Dejan ; Jafari, Peyman ; Knez, Rajna ; Franić, Tomislav ; Atilola, Olayinka ; Davidović, Nikolina ; Bagheri, Zahra ; Lakić, Antea
engleski
Can we really use available scales for child and adolescent psychopathology across cultures? A systematic review of cross-cultural measurement invariance data
In this systematic review, we assessed available evidence for cross-cultural measurement invariance of assessment scales for child and adolescent psychopathology as an indicator of cross-cultural validity. A literature search was conducted using the Medline, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Cross-cultural measurement invariance data was available for 26 scales. Based on the aggregation of the evidence from the studies under review, none of the evaluated scales have strong evidence for cross-cultural validity and suitability for cross- cultural comparison. A few of the studies showed a moderate level of measurement invariance for some scales (such as the Fear Survey Schedule for Children-Revised, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children, Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale, Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale, Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, and Disruptive Behavior Rating Scale), which may make them suitable in cross-cultural comparative studies. The remainder of the scales either showed weak or outright lack of measurement invariance. This review showed only limited testing for measurement invariance across cultural groups of scales for pediatric psychopathology, with evidence of cross- cultural validity for only a few scales. This study also revealed a need to improve practices of statistical analysis reporting in testing measurement invariance. Implications for future research are discussed.
cross-cultural comparison ; cross-cultural validity ; measurement invariance
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o izdanju
54 (1)
2017.
125-152
objavljeno
1363-4615
1461-7471
10.1177/1363461516689215
Povezanost rada
Kliničke medicinske znanosti