Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Analogous Urbanism as Discourse. Robert Adam and Urban Space in Contemporary Split (CROSBI ID 237370)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Vlaić, Ivana ; Šverko, Ana Analogous Urbanism as Discourse. Robert Adam and Urban Space in Contemporary Split // Studii de istoria şi teoria arhitecturii = Studies in history and theory of architecture, 4 (2016), 51-65

Podaci o odgovornosti

Vlaić, Ivana ; Šverko, Ana

engleski

Analogous Urbanism as Discourse. Robert Adam and Urban Space in Contemporary Split

Through an analysis of the consonances between the architecture and urban design of the Late Antique Diocletian’s Palace in Split, and the architecture that drew upon it in neoclassical London (including the Adelphi Terrace of Robert Adam and Somerset House of Sir William Chambers), the Croatian urban planner Ivana Šverko developed a considered account of the role of urban space in underdeveloped and peripheral areas of contemporary Split. Šverko’s collected ideas are characteristically original, and distinct from the kind of research usually based in an analysis of architectural and urban planning typology. In this paper we follow, and endeavour to develop further, her distinctive approach. Robert Adam (1728-1792) appropriated the architectural philosophy of Diocletian’s Palace that he had explored on the ‘peripheral’ shores of the Adriatic, and transposed many of its qualities into his British designs. In this paper, we apply his interpretation of this hybrid, adaptable building to urban landscapes on the periphery of Split. By pursuing Adam’s interpretation of the Palace, an architectural reading that stemmed from his five-week stay in Split during his European Grand Tour (1754-1758) and was published in the Ruins of the Palace of the Emperor Diocletian at Spalatro in Dalmatia (London, 1764), we identify an archetype of urban design that can be used in reflections upon the urban space of contemporary Split. This archetype will be elucidated in two specific environments on the edge of town, both of which were created during the second half of the twentieth century. One of these spaces was illegally built, unplanned, and self- organised ; the other was built according to established principles of urban plan and design, but without any proper articulation of urban space in relation to its physical and functional urban contexts. In this paper we test out our experience of the marginalised urban space within contemporary Split through two methodological approaches: the historical and the empirical. Our objective is to indicate opportunities for the identification and foregrounding of the hidden qualities of urban spaces created by runaway development (that is, spaces formulated without the benefit of architects or town planners) but as a result of the immediate needs of the inhabitants.

Robert Adam ; Adelphi Terrace ; analogous urbanism ; William Chambers ; Diocletian’s Palace ; Mosećka Street in Split ; Somerset House ; Ivana Šverko

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

4

2016.

51-65

objavljeno

2344-6544

2457-1687

Povezanost rada

Arhitektura i urbanizam, Povijest umjetnosti

Poveznice