Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Egalitarian Democracy Between Elitism and Populism (CROSBI ID 234085)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad

Cerovac, Ivan Egalitarian Democracy Between Elitism and Populism // Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 4 (2014), 2; 31-42. doi: 10.15503/jecs20142.31.42

Podaci o odgovornosti

Cerovac, Ivan

engleski

Egalitarian Democracy Between Elitism and Populism

In his influential book Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy Jacques Ranciere builds a substantial critique of liberal regimes present in most Western countries. He finds them defective because: (1) they allow wealth and economic power of groups and individuals to influence public decision-making, making those with economic power an elite group ; (2) they allow knowledge and expertise of groups and individuals to influence public decision- making, making those with epistemic power an elite group ; (3) they allow and encourage social and economic conditions that make people inappropriate for decision-making on important issues, making those with certain characteristics thus acquired an inferior group. We focus on the Ranciere’s second objection by relying on Estlund’s epistemic proceduralis approach and claim that one does not have to embrace postmodernist idea of reducing reason to relations of power in order to present a substantial critique of our contemporary society. Furthermore, we argue that one does not have to base egalitarian democracy on postmodernist ideas that reject the truth-tracking potential of democratic procedures – egalitarian democracy is perfectly compatible with the idea of truth in politics.

Ranciere ; democratic legitimacy ; elitism ; populism ; epistemic proceduralism ; deliberative democracy

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

4 (2)

2014.

31-42

objavljeno

2081-1640

10.15503/jecs20142.31.42

Povezanost rada

Filozofija

Poveznice