Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Determinants of confidence judgments in syllogistic reasoning (CROSBI ID 639654)

Prilog sa skupa u časopisu | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Bajšanski, Igor ; Žauhar, Valnea Determinants of confidence judgments in syllogistic reasoning // Review of psychology / Buško, Vesna (ur.). 2016. str. 69-70

Podaci o odgovornosti

Bajšanski, Igor ; Žauhar, Valnea

engleski

Determinants of confidence judgments in syllogistic reasoning

According to the self-consistency model of subjective confidence (Koriat, 2012), confidence judgments are related to the consensuality of the answer (the proportion of participants who choose the answer) rather than to its accuracy. In a domain of syllogistic reasoning, previous studies (Prowse Turner & Thompson, 2009 ; Shynkaruk & Thompson, 2006) found that reasoning accuracy and confidence were generally not correlated, and that confidence and accuracy were mediated by different variables. The aim of this study was to analyze differences in confidence judgments as a function of response accuracy and response consensuality. Participants were given booklets with syllogistic problems. They were instructed to produce conclusions, and after each task they were asked to make confidence judgments. All logically possible pairs of premises regarding mood of premises and syllogism figure were included. The obtained results strongly supported the predictions of the self-consistency model. For consensually correct syllogisms confidence was higher for correct than for incorrect answers, but for consensually incorrect syllogisms confidence was higher for incorrect than for correct answers. While item consensuality correlated positively with confidence, the correlation between item accuracy and confidence was not significant. However, for items with a consensually correct response, correlation between confidence and accuracy was positive, but for items with a consensually incorrect response correlation between confidence and accuracy was negative. The evidence obtained in this study supports the conclusion that similar patterns of relationships between confidence and accuracy established for different types of tasks (Koriat, 2012) also hold in the domain of reasoning. Confidence judgments do not monitor the actual reasoning performance, but they rely on different types of cues, which are also related to the consensuality of conclusions.

syllogistic reasoning ; metareasoning ; confidence ; consensuality principle

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

69-70.

2016.

nije evidentirano

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

Review of psychology

Buško, Vesna

Jasrebarsko : Zagreb: Naklada Slap

1330-6812

1849-0905

Podaci o skupu

12th Alps-Adria Psychology Conference

predavanje

29.09.2016-30.09.2016

Rijeka, Hrvatska

Povezanost rada

Kognitivna znanost (prirodne, tehničke, biomedicina i zdravstvo, društvene i humanističke znanosti), Psihologija