Assessment of pre-analytical quality indicators with sigma-metrics (CROSBI ID 635455)
Prilog sa skupa u časopisu | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija
Podaci o odgovornosti
Vukasović, Ines ; Ćelap, Ivana ; Pavić, Marina ; Mayer, Ljiljana ; vrkić, Nada
engleski
Assessment of pre-analytical quality indicators with sigma-metrics
Retrospective analysis of data collected in 2014 regarding unfilled required data in the request- form, sample misidentification and recollection. Misidentification errors refer to unlabeled or wrong labeled sample container. Recollection was needed for inappropriate sample quality caused by extreme hemolysis, clotting or inappropriate sample-anticoagulant volume ratio. Laboratory is organized as multisite with 3 spaciously separated laboratories (1 km (B) and 4 km (C) distance from the main premises (A)) differing in laboratory and hospital information management system (LIS and HIS) or procedures for requesting laboratory services. Pareto analysis was used to identify the most prevalent request-form errors. Sigma is calculated by the use of Westgards´ six- sigma calculator. Data were analysed by Medcalc Statistical software. From the total of 424027 requests unfilled data on request-form were notified in 49396 cases (11.6% ; sigma 2.7) with difference between sites (P<0.0001): A (13.0% ; sigma 2.8), B (6.4% ; sigma 2.9), C (0.3% ; sigma 4.3). The most critical request-form errors: patient name (C: >6.0 ; A: 5.1 ; B: 4.5) ; date of birth (C >6.0 ; B: 5.0 ; A: 4.3), test ordered (B: >6.0 ; A: 5.3 ; C: 4.6), had sigma >4.0 or close to quality goal of 5.0. Misidentified were 121/424027 samples (0.03% ; sigma 5.0) and B laboratory recorded the highest rate (0.14% ; sigma 4.5) in comparison with C (0.01% ; P<0.0001 ; sigma 5.2) and A (0.02% ; P<0.0001 ; sigma 5.1). Recollection was indicated in 4868/424027 cases (1.1% ; sigma 3.8) with difference between sites (P<0.0001): A (1.0% ; sigma 3.9), B (1.8% ; sigma 3.6), C (2.2%, sigma 3.5). The observed samples quality required for reliable analysis is not good to reach sigma 5.0 and laboratory should pay more attention to find a way to improve it. The main causes for 80% of all request-form errors were site specific and dependent on LIS and HIS used.
indikatori kvalitete; sigmametrija
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
S982-S982.
2015.
nije evidentirano
objavljeno
Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Plebani, Mario
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
1434-6621
Podaci o skupu
EuroMedLab Paris 2015
poster
21.06.2015-25.06.2015
Pariz, Francuska
Povezanost rada
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Farmacija