Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 806206

Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization


Krupić, Dino; Corr, Philip J.; Ručević, Silvija; Križanić, Valerija; Gračanin, Asmir
Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization // Personality and individual differences, 97 (2016), 13-19 doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


Naslov
Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization

Autori
Krupić, Dino ; Corr, Philip J. ; Ručević, Silvija ; Križanić, Valerija ; Gračanin, Asmir

Izvornik
Personality and individual differences (0191-8869) 97 (2016); 13-19

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
Reinforcement sensitivity theory ; confirmatory factor analysis ; generalizability

Sažetak
There are six purpose-built Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) personality questionnaires currently in use to measure the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS), the behavioural inhibition system (BIS), and the behavioural approach system(BAS). They differ in their conceptualizations and operational constructs, and this poses a problem for their differential validity and the generalizability of results, and comparison of results from different studies. This paper examined the psychometric properties of five of these RST questionnaires, with a total sample of 821 participants, taken from the factor structures for the Croatian translations of BIS/BAS scales, SPSRQ, Jackson-5, RSQ and RST-PQ. Data were analysed by correlational and confirmatory factor analyses. We found some of these questionnaires achieved marginal to adequate fit indices, and they showed ambiguity in terms of convergent validity for all three general behavioural systems. These findings highlight the difficulties with generalization and comparison of results with the use of different RST questionnaires. Based on these findings, as well as the ongoing debate concerning how best to measure RST constructs, we provide information on how to interpret results from the studies conducted with different RST scales.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus


Citati