Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 737805

Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife


Gužvica, Goran; Bošnjak, Ivana; Bielen, Ana; Babić, Danijel; Radanović-Gužvica, Biserka; Šver, Lidija
Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife // PLoS ONE, 9 (2014), 8; 1-12 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106194 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 737805 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife

Autori
Gužvica, Goran ; Bošnjak, Ivana ; Bielen, Ana ; Babić, Danijel ; Radanović-Gužvica, Biserka ; Šver, Lidija

Izvornik
PLoS ONE (1932-6203) 9 (2014), 8; 1-12

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
green bridges; monitoring methods; wildlife

Sažetak
Green bridges are used to decrease highly negative impact of roads/highways on wildlife populations and their effectiveness is evaluated by various monitoring methods. Based on the 3-year monitoring of four Croatian green bridges, we compared the effectiveness of three indirect monitoring methods: track-pads, camera traps and active infrared (IR) trail monitoring system. The ability of the methods to detect different species and to give good estimation of number of animal crossings was analyzed. The accuracy of species detection by track-pad method was influenced by granulometric composition of track-pad material, with the best results obtained with higher percentage of silt and clay. We compared the species composition determined by track-pad and camera trap methods and found that monitoring by tracks underestimated the ratio of small canids, while camera traps underestimated the ratio of roe deer. Regarding total number of recorder events, active IR detectors recorded from 11 to 19 times more events then camera traps and app. 80% of them were not caused by animal crossings. Camera trap method underestimated the real number of total events. Therefore, an algorithm for filtration of the IR dataset was developed for approximation of the real number of crossings. Presented results are valuable for future monitoring of wildlife crossings in Croatia and elsewhere, since advantages and disadvantages of used monitoring methods are shown. In conclusion, different methods should be chosen/combined depending on the aims of the particular monitoring study.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Biologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove:
Prehrambeno-biotehnološki fakultet, Zagreb,
Hrvatski prirodoslovni muzej,
OIKON d.o.o.

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi www.plosone.org

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Gužvica, Goran; Bošnjak, Ivana; Bielen, Ana; Babić, Danijel; Radanović-Gužvica, Biserka; Šver, Lidija
Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife // PLoS ONE, 9 (2014), 8; 1-12 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106194 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Gužvica, G., Bošnjak, I., Bielen, A., Babić, D., Radanović-Gužvica, B. & Šver, L. (2014) Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife. PLoS ONE, 9 (8), 1-12 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106194.
@article{article, author = {Gu\v{z}vica, Goran and Bo\v{s}njak, Ivana and Bielen, Ana and Babi\'{c}, Danijel and Radanovi\'{c}-Gu\v{z}vica, Biserka and \v{S}ver, Lidija}, year = {2014}, pages = {1-12}, DOI = {10.1371/journal.pone.0106194}, keywords = {green bridges, monitoring methods, wildlife}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0106194}, volume = {9}, number = {8}, issn = {1932-6203}, title = {Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife}, keyword = {green bridges, monitoring methods, wildlife} }
@article{article, author = {Gu\v{z}vica, Goran and Bo\v{s}njak, Ivana and Bielen, Ana and Babi\'{c}, Danijel and Radanovi\'{c}-Gu\v{z}vica, Biserka and \v{S}ver, Lidija}, year = {2014}, pages = {1-12}, DOI = {10.1371/journal.pone.0106194}, keywords = {green bridges, monitoring methods, wildlife}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0106194}, volume = {9}, number = {8}, issn = {1932-6203}, title = {Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife}, keyword = {green bridges, monitoring methods, wildlife} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font