Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 734848

The effect of consensuality on metacognitive judgments in syllogistic reasoning


Bajšanski, Igor; Močibob, Maja; Valerjev, Pavle
The effect of consensuality on metacognitive judgments in syllogistic reasoning // TSPC 2014 - Proceedings of the Trieste Symposium on Perception and Cognition / Bernardis, Paolo ; Fantoni, Carlo ; Gerbino, Walter (ur.).
Trieste: EUT – Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014. str. 88-90 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


Naslov
The effect of consensuality on metacognitive judgments in syllogistic reasoning

Autori
Bajšanski, Igor ; Močibob, Maja ; Valerjev, Pavle

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
TSPC 2014 - Proceedings of the Trieste Symposium on Perception and Cognition / Bernardis, Paolo ; Fantoni, Carlo ; Gerbino, Walter - Trieste : EUT – Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014, 88-90

ISBN
978-88-8303-610-1

Skup
TSPC 2014 - Trieste Symposium on Perception and Cognition

Mjesto i datum
Trst, Italija, 27-28.11.2014.

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Metacognition; syllogistic reasoning; judgment accuracy

Sažetak
The aim of this study was to examine the relation of the consensuality of answers in syllogistic reasoning problems to metacognitive judgments and response times. In two experiments, participants (N=126) solved syllogistic problems and made metacognitive judgments (judgment of confidence in the correctness of the answer and judgment of task difficulty), after or before solving each problem. Intraindividual correlation coefficients (Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient) between reasoning accuracy and metacognitive judgments and between answer consensuality and metacognitive judgments were computed from the joint data of both experiments. Mean gamma coefficients were higher for consensuality than for reasoning accuracy both for judgments of confidence and judgments of task difficulty. Also, consensual answers were given more quickly than nonconsensual answers. The results indicate that reasoners, instead of monitoring their actual performance, seem to rely on different type of cues while making metacognitive judgments in syllogistic reasoning. Both consensuality and its relation to metacognitive judgments could be the outcome of processes of the generation of possible answers while solving syllogistic reasoning problems.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Psihologija

Napomena
This work was supported by Grant 4139 from the Croatian Science Foundation and the University of Rijeka Research Grant 13.04.1.3.11



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove
Filozofski fakultet, Rijeka,
Sveučilište u Zadru