Family Practice Depression and Multi-morbidity (FPDM): A European consensus on a diagnostic depression tool in primary care (CROSBI ID 618085)
Prilog sa skupa u časopisu | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija
Podaci o odgovornosti
Nabbe, Patrice ; Le Reste, Jean-Yves ; Robert E, Czachowski, Slawomir ; Doer, Christa ; Assenova, Radost, Stojanovic-Spehar, Stanislava, Hasanagic, Melida ; Kašuba Lazić, Đurđica ; Lingner, Heidrun ; Lygidakis Harris, Argyriadou, Stella ; Claveria, Ana ; Ferdinandez, San Martin MI ; Munoz Perez, Miquel Angel ; van Marwijc, Harm, van Royen, Paul ; Lietard, Claire
engleski
Family Practice Depression and Multi-morbidity (FPDM): A European consensus on a diagnostic depression tool in primary care
Background: Family practice depression and Multi-morbidity is a European study aimed to prevent depression in adult multimorbid patients in primary care. A common validated diagnostic tool (effective, reliable and ergonomic) was mandatory for patient's inclusion in FPDM. Research question: What is the best (effective, reliable and ergonomics) tool for depression's diagnostic vetrsus DSM-IV in primary care for adult patients? Method: The modified RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM) or RAND/UCLA has been selected. This RAM consisted of a systematic literature review plus a consensus procedure (two Delphi rounds with an expert panel meeting inserted in between). The grup of experts was purposive. They had to be European researchers and GPs. Aim of the systematic review was to extract validated diagnostic tools versus DSM-IV. The searched effectiveness criterion was Youden index. The searched reliability criterion was Cronbach's alpha. Ergonomics data were extracted from the literature (structure, interrogation technique, duration). Results: Seven validated diagnostic tools were revealed. At the end of the first Delphi round, two instruments were considered sufficiently effective and reliable to be used: the Hospital Anxiety and depression Scale (HADS) and the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25 (HSCL-25). Ergonomics was tested during the panel meeting during EGPRN Antwerp meeting (October 2012). With the second Delphi round the experts selected HSCL-25 as the best consensus for its effectiveness, reliability and ergonomics. Conclusion: The HSCL 25 is the best consensus tool for a depression diagnosis in adult patients in general practice setting. The best effective, reliable and ergonomic tool Will enable the selection of homogenous populations across Europe for FPDM.
depression; diagnostic tool; family medicine
European Journal of General Practice, 2013 ; 19:162-184
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
2013.
nije evidentirano
objavljeno
Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji
The European journal of general practice
Maastricht:
1381-4788
Podaci o skupu
European General practice Research Network , conference (EGPRN)
ostalo
16.05.2013-19.05.2013
Kuşadası, Turska
Povezanost rada
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita