engleski

Democracy as the rule of nobody

I would like to contribute to the ongoing debate on democracy by discussing the notion of the rule of nobody. I first address Rosanvallon’s theory of counter-democracy and Keane’s concept of monitory democracy. Keane writes about ‘monitory democracy’ not only as a new phase in the development of democracy on a global scale, but primarily as an abolishment of all domination in human relations. His idea that in a monitory democracy ‘no body rules’, has been criticized by John Dunn and John Gray. They consider it meaningless to claim that in democracy ‘no body rules’, since every form of rule needs rulers. I would like to show that both this supposedly realistic criticism and Keane’s version of the rule of nobody are too literal and superficial. If we consider democracy to be a kind of sentiment rather than a set of political institutions, we get closer to the puzzling idea that ‘no body rules’. This idea, namely, is not about abolishing the rule of men over men, but about being aware of the contingency of all forms of mastery. This was well known to Plato and has been convincingly revived in the works of the French philosopher Jacques Rancière

Democracy; counter-democracy; monitory democracy; rule of nobody

nije evidentirano