Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

In vitro assessment of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators (CROSBI ID 209922)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Matijević, Jurica ; Ljubičić, Anita ; Švegar, Domagoj ; Verzak, Željko ; Jukić Krmek, Silvana ; Karlović, Zoran ; Paris, Simeon In vitro assessment of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators // Paediatria Croatica, 58 (2014), 2; 107-113

Podaci o odgovornosti

Matijević, Jurica ; Ljubičić, Anita ; Švegar, Domagoj ; Verzak, Željko ; Jukić Krmek, Silvana ; Karlović, Zoran ; Paris, Simeon

engleski

In vitro assessment of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators

Aim of this in vitro study was to compare accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) (ES-02, ES-03 and ProPex) in root canals of extracted human teeth utilizing two meter readings and different conditions of root canals (RC). RC lengths of 46 single-rooted teeth were visually determined using a K-file # 15. Teeth and labial connector were then embedded in alginate. Two sets of measurements were performed for each device - root canal condition combination (dry root canal, 2.5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, RC prep, Glyde) according to readings “-0.5” and “0.0”. The differences were evaluated using descriptive and nonparametric statistics. The mean difference between real and measured values at meter reading “0.0” was 0.10 mm with ProPex, 0.31 mm with ES-02 and 0.71 mm with ES- 03. At meter reading “-0.5“ that difference was 0.28 mm with ProPex, 0.41 mm with ES-02 and 0.87 mm with ES-03. In vitro testing showed ProPex to be the most accurate EAL in most of combinations, followed by ES-02, and ES-03 (p<0.05). Most accurate measurements were performed in canal conditions as follows: dry canals, Glyde, Rc- Prep, NaOCl and EDTA solutions (p<0.05). ProPex was the most accurate at meter reading “0.0”. At reading “-0.5” ES-02 and ProPex were equal, whereas ES-03 was the least accurate. All tested EALs should be used with meter reading “0.0” as a reference because it is more accurate than using the meter reading “-0.5” (p<0.001).

dental instruments ; electronics ; medical ; humans ; odontometry ; root canal preparation ; tooth apex

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

58 (2)

2014.

107-113

objavljeno

1330-1403

1846-405X

Povezanost rada

Dentalna medicina, Psihologija

Poveznice
Indeksiranost