Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 692901

Group Assessment of Learning Management Systems


Pipan, Matic; Arh, Tanja; Srdjevic, Zorica; Srdjevic, Bojan; Balaban, Igor
Group Assessment of Learning Management Systems // Focus 2020: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on organizational Science Development / Balantič, Zvone et al. (ur.).
Kranj: University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, 2014. str. 564-570 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


Naslov
Group Assessment of Learning Management Systems

Autori
Pipan, Matic ; Arh, Tanja ; Srdjevic, Zorica ; Srdjevic, Bojan ; Balaban, Igor

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Izvornik
Focus 2020: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on organizational Science Development / Balantič, Zvone et al. - Kranj : University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, 2014, 564-570

ISBN
978-961-232-274-8

Skup
33rd international conference on organizational Science Development Slovenia

Mjesto i datum
Portorož, Slovenija, 19-21.3.2014.

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Learning management system; analytic hierarchy process; DEXi; group decision making; consistency measures

Sažetak
In our earlier works (Srdjevic et al., 2012 ; Pipan et al., 2013) it was shown that if there are several available Learning Management Systems (LMS), a multi-criteria method AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) or DEXi multi-criteria model can be used to support decision maker in selecting the most suitable system. The decision making results of the application obtained by the individual expert using above mentioned methods have been already compared and published in Pipan et al. (2013). Here we extend an approach to group assessment. Three experts from the Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) domain evaluated the same three LMSs against five typical criteria and their individual decisions were aggregated geometrically to obtain the final group decision. Unbiased weighting of decision makers is assumed and the consistency indicators were checked for each decision maker to justify associated equal weights and preserve that the final decision was correctly derived.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Ustanove
Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varaždin

Autor s matičnim brojem:
Igor Balaban, (261895)