engleski

Representation of Sovereign and Public Space in Zagreb

Public space is naturalized images of historical and contemporary political, social and cultural relations, which they were enrolled in all, apparently neutral, urban forms: from a comprehensive model of urbanization, and architectural styles, street inventory, public sculpture and, inevitably, the modes of public communication. For public communication at the highest level of ideological monuments occupy an irreplaceable role. '... Monuments show ways of expressing grief that all but the far' out 'policy, but are framed in the dominant narrative and generic forms.' However, except for sadness as one of the incentives to raise monuments, more often they are devoted to prominent figures, folk heroes, or important events for the whole country. "Historical memory can be regarded as the one on which we are reminded, that is different from that which alone remember, the 'historical consciousness' can be understood as an allusion to that part of the mind map that selects history, historicity, or rather, as a model for editing past experience of the world. Collected memories ... always has historically (and narratological) and the product is always a reminder of the program. 'That's why more public monuments speak of the political context, social occasions, ideological positions of authority and cultural environment, rather than about the person you represent. Selection of historical figures, the selection of modes of presentation, location of the monument which will be set and who will make all of these factors are actually the elements from which the symbolic function of the monument reads.

monuments; sovereigns; public art; urban icon; Zagreb; art; ideology; Ban Jelačić; King Tomislav

nije evidentirano