Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia (CROSBI ID 176663)

Prilog u časopisu | stručni rad

Protić, Alen ; Horvat, Mladen ; Komen-Ušljebrka, Helga ; Frković, Vedran ; Žuvić-Butorac, Marta ; Bukal, Krešimir ; Šustić, Alan Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia // Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122 (2010), 19/20; 584-587. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

Podaci o odgovornosti

Protić, Alen ; Horvat, Mladen ; Komen-Ušljebrka, Helga ; Frković, Vedran ; Žuvić-Butorac, Marta ; Bukal, Krešimir ; Šustić, Alan

engleski

Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has gained popularity for ankle and foot surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate the sufficiency of anesthesia for ankle surgery as well as duration of analgesia in postoperative period, using minimal invasive ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, and to compare it with anesthesia and postoperative analgesia following spinal anesthesia. This prospective study included 40 adult trauma patients with bimalleolar fracture who were scheduled for surgery. They were randomly assigned and divided in two groups. Patients from the first group underwent an Ultrasound-guided femoro-popliteal block (US-FPB), while a spinal anesthesia (SA) was performed for the second group. The local anesthetic 0.5% bupivacaine was used in both groups. Eighteen patients from the first and nineteen patients from the second group completed the study. Levels of anesthesia were sufficient in both groups without significant differences. Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in US-FPB group in comparison to SA group (12 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 1 h) (p < 0.001). At the same time, onset of complete sensory motor block was significantly faster in SA group in comparison to US-FPB group (5 ± 1 vs. 8 ± 3 min) (p < 0.001). Minimal invasive US-FPB provides sufficient anesthesia for ankle fracture. In comparison to the SA group, patients from the US-FPB group achieved significantly longer postoperative analgesia, while faster onset of anesthesia was noted in SA group.

ultrasound; femoro-popliteal block; anckle surgery; spinal anesthesia

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

122 (19/20)

2010.

584-587

objavljeno

0043-5325

10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost