Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (CROSBI ID 163795)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Šember, Marijan ; Utrobičić, Ana ; Petrak, Jelka Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar // Croatian medical journal, 51 (2010), 2; 99-103. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.99

Podaci o odgovornosti

Šember, Marijan ; Utrobičić, Ana ; Petrak, Jelka

engleski

Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

Aim: To analyze the 2007 citation count of articles published by the Croatian Medical Journal in 2005-2006 based on data from the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Methods: Web of Science and Scopus were searched for the articles published in 2005-2006. As all articles returned by Scopus were included in Web of Science, the latter list was the sample for further analysis. Total citation counts for each article on the list were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The overlap and unique citations were compared and analyzed. Proportions were compared using chi(2)-test. Results: Google Scholar returned the greatest proportion of articles with citations (45%), followed by Scopus (42%), and Web of Science (38%). Almost a half (49%) of articles had no citations and 11% had an equal number of identical citations in all 3 databases. The greatest overlap was found between Web of Science and Scopus (54%), followed by Scopus and Google Scholar (51%), and Web of Science and Google Scholar (44%). The greatest number of unique citations was found by Google Scholar (n=86). The majority of these citations (64%) came from journals, followed by books and PhD theses. Approximately 55% of all citing documents were full-text resources in open access. The language of citing documents was mostly English, but as many as 25 citing documents (29%) were in Chinese. Conclusion: Google Scholar shares a total of 42% citations returned by two others, more influential, bibliographic resources. The list of unique citations in Google Scholar is predominantly journal based, but these journals are mainly of local character. Citations received by internationally recognized medical journals are crucial for increasing the visibility of small medical journals but Google Scholar may serve as an alternative bibliometric tool for an orientational citation insight.

Databases - Bibliographic; Bibliometrics; Periodicals as Topic; Information Storage and Retrieval

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

51 (2)

2010.

99-103

objavljeno

0353-9504

10.3325/cmj.2010.51.99

Povezanost rada

Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost