Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Emanuel Edward Klein — The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875 (CROSBI ID 156734)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Atalić, Bruno ; Fatović-Ferenčić, Stella Emanuel Edward Klein — The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875 // Toxicologic pathology, 37 (2009), 6; 708-713. doi: 10.1177/0192623309345871

Podaci o odgovornosti

Atalić, Bruno ; Fatović-Ferenčić, Stella

engleski

Emanuel Edward Klein — The Father of British Microbiology and the Case of the Animal Vivisection Controversy of 1875

The new Appendix A of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, which gives guidelines for accommodation and care of animals and was approved on June 15, 2006, was the main reason the authors decided to investigate the origins of the regulations of animal experiments. Although one might assume that the regulation had its origin in the United Nations conventions, the truth is that its origins are a hundred years old. The authors present a case of the nineteenth-century vivisection controversy brought about by the publication of the Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory in 1873, in which John Burdon-Sanderson, Emanuel Edward Klein, Michael Foster, and Thomas Lauder Brunton described a series of vivisection experiments they performed on animals for research purposes. It was the first case of vivisection to be examined, processed, and condemned for inhuman behavior toward animals before an official body, leading to enactment of the Cruelty to Animals Act in 1876. The case reveals a specific ethos of science in the second half of the nineteenth century, which was characterized by a deep commitment of scientists to the scientific enterprise and their strong belief that science could solve social problems, combined with an overt insensitivity to the suffering of experimental animals. The central figure in the case was Emanuel Edward Klein, a disciple of the Central European medical tradition (Vienna Medical School) and a direct follower of the experimental school of Bru¨cke, Stricker, Magendie, and Bernard. Because of his undisguised attitudes and opinions on the use of vivisection, Klein became a paradigm of the new scientific identity, strongly influencing the stereotypic image of a scientist, and polarizing the public opinion on vivisection in England in the nineteenth century and for some considerable time afterward.

Klein ; Emanuel Edward ; physiology ; nineteenth century ; vivisectionism ; antivivisectionism ; United Kingdom

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

37 (6)

2009.

708-713

objavljeno

0192-6233

1533-1601

10.1177/0192623309345871

Povezanost rada

Temeljne medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost