engleski

Burden of proof v. intime conviction: Two strategies of explaining factual findings in court judgments

The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.

civil procedure; intime conviction; burden of proof; evidence; court judgments

nije evidentirano