Funkcija sudskih obrazloženja i nove države članice (CROSBI ID 34497)
Prilog u knjizi | izvorni znanstveni rad
Podaci o odgovornosti
Rodin, Siniša
engleski
Funkcija sudskih obrazloženja i nove države članice
First, I believe that law is defined not by its black letter but by its meaning and that the definition of what the law is (meaning of law) is a function of interaction of multiple actors. Second, I hold that discoursive definition of law results in "politicization" of law by bringing regulatory purposes and policies into legal analysis. Certainly participants to the discourse have different strenghts and faculties to contribute to the definition of law. Finally, once defined, law is subject to permanent re-interpretation through legal and social discourse. In this paper I will first explain my position why judicial opinion matters. In the second part I will outline the functions of judicial opinion. In the third part I will propose that certain elements of communist legal culture may become, or may have already become, a legitimate part of mainstream legal discourse in Europe. Finally, I will conclude with an expectation that post-communist legal systems will develop in direction of pluralist legal discourse.
sudska obrazloženja, najviši sudovi, interpretacija
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
369-388.
objavljeno
Podaci o knjizi
The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Rulings, Judicial Deliberations and Beyond
Nick Hulls, Maurice Adams and Jacco Bomhoff
Den Haag: T.M.C. Asser Press
2009.
978-90-6704-289-5