Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Comparison of different methods for lean percentage evaluation in pig carcasses (CROSBI ID 126576)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad

Kušec, Goran ; Kralik, Gordana ; Petričević, Antun ; Đurkin, Ivona ; Margeta, Vladimir ; Maltar, Zlata Z. Comparison of different methods for lean percentage evaluation in pig carcasses // Acta agraria Kaposvariensis, 10 (2006), 2; 57-62

Podaci o odgovornosti

Kušec, Goran ; Kralik, Gordana ; Petričević, Antun ; Đurkin, Ivona ; Margeta, Vladimir ; Maltar, Zlata Z.

engleski

Comparison of different methods for lean percentage evaluation in pig carcasses

Present study was carried out on 64 pig carcasses selected according to backfat measures by instrumental method approved in Croatia. One day after slaughter the carcasses were dissected according to EU referent method. Dissected lean percentage was calculated by formula from Commission Regulation (EC) No 3127/94 and also by equations for estimation of lean percentage approved by Croatian Regulation. Lean meat percentage objectively determined by EU referent dissection method was 51.9% in average. When instrumental method and “ two points” method were applied, estimated lean meat percentage was 55.1% and 56.6%, respectively. Comparison of dissection, as referent and objective method, with instrumental and “ two points” methods for estimation of lean meat percentage showed that both estimation methods differ statistically (p<0.01) from dissection. The differences indicate overestimation of meatiness in the pig carcasses. There is need for establishment of new formulae for lean meat percentage assessment in Croatia.

pig ; carcass ; lean percentage ; assessment methods

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

10 (2)

2006.

57-62

objavljeno

1418-1789

Povezanost rada

Poljoprivreda (agronomija)