Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

How intuitive are ICMJE criteria for authorship? Perceptions of deserved authorship among medical students and physicians (CROSBI ID 508960)

Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija

Hren, Darko ; Sambunjak Dario ; Ivaniš, Ana ; Marušić, Matko ; Marušić, Ana How intuitive are ICMJE criteria for authorship? Perceptions of deserved authorship among medical students and physicians // International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication : Book of abstracts. 2005. str. 45-46

Podaci o odgovornosti

Hren, Darko ; Sambunjak Dario ; Ivaniš, Ana ; Marušić, Matko ; Marušić, Ana

engleski

How intuitive are ICMJE criteria for authorship? Perceptions of deserved authorship among medical students and physicians

To analyze medical students' and physicians' perception of research contributions as criteria for authorship in relation to the authorship criteria defined by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE): ("Conception and design of study" OR "Analysis and interpretation of data" OR "Collection and assembly of data") AND ("Drafting of the article" OR "Critical revision of manuscript") AND "Final approval of the article". Medical students with (n=152) or without (n=85) prior instruction on ICMJE criteria, graduate students and doctors attending a continuing medical education course (n=125), and medical teachers experienced in scientific publishing (n=112) evaluated the importance of 11 research contributions as authorship qualifications on a scale from 1 - no importance to 4 - high importance. They also reported single contributions eligible for authorship, as well as combinations of 2 or 3 qualifying contributions. Four groups were compared on the average importance they attributed to each contribution. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using average importance of each contribution as well as frequency of each appearance as a single or partial authorship criterion (SPSS 11.0 statistical software). "Conception and design of study", "Analysis and interpretation of data" and "Drafting of article" formed the most important cluster in all four groups. The effect of instruction to medical students was found for "Critical revision of manuscript" and "Final approval of the article". "Final approval" was a part of the least important cluster in all groups except students with instruction. "Conception and design", "Analysis and interpretation of data" and "Drafting of article" are ICMJE criteria for authorship recognized as most important by all participants, and can be considered "intuitive", i.e. independent of previous instruction. "Critical revision of manuscript", "Final approval" and "Acquisition of data" are less acknowledged contributions and their significance should be taught actively to students and authors.

authorship; ICMJE; education

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o prilogu

45-46.

2005.

objavljeno

Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji

International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication : Book of abstracts

Podaci o skupu

5. International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication

poster

16.09.2005-18.09.2005

Chicago (IL), Sjedinjene Američke Države

Povezanost rada

Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita