Navigating the new world of scientific publications: Croatian scientists and predatory journals (CROSBI ID 731367)
Prilog sa skupa u zborniku | prošireni sažetak izlaganja sa skupa | međunarodna recenzija
Podaci o odgovornosti
Romić, Kristina ; Hebrang Grgić, Ivana
engleski
Navigating the new world of scientific publications: Croatian scientists and predatory journals
n increasing number of scholarly journals and scientific papers are available in open access on the journal’s websites (gold open access) and in repositories (green open access). Although both ways of achieving open access provide free access to end users, publishing costs still exist and are collected from a variety of sources, e.g. through article processing charges (APC) or crowdfunding (Spezi, Fry, Creaser, Probets and White, 2013). The idea of the open access model was to make high quality journals available to the widest possible public (BOAI, 2002) and the model today has many benefits for the scientific communication. Nevertheless, a deviation has developed recently. The deviation – the emergence of so-called predatory journals – threatens quality and reliability of scientific communication. Such journals attract authors with low APC fees, fast publication, and false indexation data (Beal, 2015 ; Jalalian, Mahboobi, 2014). Predatory journals and publishers promise quick peer-review, they often have fake editorials listed on their websites, send emails inviting authors to publish papers or offering them to be editors of their journals (Bowman, 2014). Those journals are in open access, they use article processing charges model but do not control the quality (i.e. peer review process is insufficient or, in most cases, non- existent). As the information published in such journals is not verified, there is a possibility that it is wrong and further research should not be based on it. Although there is a lot of information in the literature about the common features of predatory journals and publishers, they can be defined as “the entities which prioritize self-interest at the expense of financial gain and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publishing practices, lack of transparency, and/or persistent and random requests” (Grudniewicz et al., 2019, p. 211).
open access journals ; “predatory journals” ; questionable journals ; scientific communication
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
nije evidentirano
Podaci o prilogu
63-65.
2022.
objavljeno
Podaci o matičnoj publikaciji
PUBMET2022: The 9th Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science
Cupar, Drahomira ; Džoić, Zrinka
Zadar: Sveučilište u Zadru
Podaci o skupu
PUBMET 2022: The 9th Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science
poster
14.09.2022-16.09.2022
Zadar, Hrvatska