Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Diagnostic and Practical Value of Abbreviated Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Diagnostics (CROSBI ID 317683)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Drinković, Martin ; Drinković, Ivan ; Milevčić, Dražen ; Matijević, Filip ; Drinković, Vlatka ; Markotić, Antonio ; Tadić, Tade ; Plavec, Davor Diagnostic and Practical Value of Abbreviated Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Diagnostics // Cancers, 14 (2022), 22; 5645, 13. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225645

Podaci o odgovornosti

Drinković, Martin ; Drinković, Ivan ; Milevčić, Dražen ; Matijević, Filip ; Drinković, Vlatka ; Markotić, Antonio ; Tadić, Tade ; Plavec, Davor

engleski

Diagnostic and Practical Value of Abbreviated Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Diagnostics

BACKGROUND: Although MRI is the most efficient method of detecting breast cancer, its standard protocol is time-consuming and expensive. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the modified innovative abbreviated MRI protocol (AMRP) and the standard magnetic resonance protocol (SMRP) when detecting breast cancer.METHODS: The research involved 477 patients referred for breast MRI due to suspected lesions. They were randomly assigned to the AMRP group (N = 232) or the SMRP group (N = 245). The AMRP comprised one native (contrast-free) and four post-contrast dynamic sequences of T1-weighted volume imaging for breast assessment (VIBRANT) and 3d MIP (maximum intensity projection) lasting for eight minutes. All the patients underwent a core biopsy of their lesions and histopathological analysis.RESULTS: The groups were comparable regarding the pre-screening and post-diagnostic characteristics and were of average (±SD) age at breast cancer diagnosis of 53.6 ± 12.7 years. There was no significant difference between the two protocols in terms of specificity or sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis. The sensitivity (95% Cis) of the AMRP was 99.05% (96.6-99.9%), and its specificity was 59.09% (36.4-79.3%), whereas the sensitivity of the SMRP was 98.12% (95.3-99.5%) and its specificity was 68.75% (50.0-83.9%). Most of the tumors comprised one solid lesion in one of the breasts (77.3%), followed by multicentric tumors (16%), bilateral tumors (4.3%), and multifocal tumors (1.7%). The average size of tumors was approximately 14 mm (ranging from 3 mm to 72 mm).CONCLUSION: Our innovative AMR protocol showed comparable specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of breast cancer when compared to SMRP, which is the gold standard for histopathological diagnosis. This can lead to great savings in terms of the time and cost of imaging and interpretation.

abbreviated MRI protocol ; breast cancer ; magnetic resonance imaging ; full diagnostic protocol

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

14 (22)

2022.

5645

13

objavljeno

2072-6694

10.3390/cancers14225645

Povezanost rada

Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost