Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Clinical predictors of metal allergic sensitization in orthodontic patients (CROSBI ID 315285)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Žigante, Martina ; Špalj, Stjepan Clinical predictors of metal allergic sensitization in orthodontic patients // Central European journal of public health, 30 (2022), 3; 173-178. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7122

Podaci o odgovornosti

Žigante, Martina ; Špalj, Stjepan

engleski

Clinical predictors of metal allergic sensitization in orthodontic patients

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the predictors of allergic sensitisation to titanium and nickel in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Methods: A total of 250 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were invited to participate, and 235 were analysed (67% females). A patch test was performed using nickel sulphate, titanium, titanium dioxide, titanium oxalate, titanium nitride, and petrolatum as control. In addition, clinical signs of the oral mucosa, gingiva, tongue, lips, and allergological history were assessed. Results: The predictors of metal allergic sensitisation in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were adult age (OR = 2.6 ; 95% CI: 1.2- 5.5 ; p = 0.016), female sex (OR = 3.0 ; 95% CI: 1.1-7.9 ; p = 0.025), exfoliative cheilitis (OR = 4.8 ; 95% CI: 1.9-12.4 ; p = 0.001), history of contact hypersensitivity (OR = 7.0 ; 95% CI: 1.3- 35.4 ; p = 0.025), history of contact hypersensitivity to metals (OR = 8.3 ; 95% CI: 1.4- 50.2 ; p = 0.021), and piercings (OR = 5.4 ; 95% CI: 2.1-13.9 ; p = 0.001). When predictors were analysed separately for these two metals, titanium sensitisation predictors were contact hypersensitivity to metals and piercing, whereas nickel sensitisation predictors were age and piercing. Conclusion: A positive patch test alone cannot draw definite conclusions regarding allergy. However, metal allergies in patients with orthodontic appliances could be considered in cases of previous contact hypersensitivity, previous reactions to metals, exfoliative cheilitis, and piercing.

allergic sensitization, titanium ; nickel, orthodontics

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

30 (3)

2022.

173-178

objavljeno

1210-7778

1803-1048

10.21101/cejph.a7122

Povezanost rada

Dentalna medicina, Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost