Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Važnost pojma štete u raspravi o mentalnim poremećajima (CROSBI ID 328066)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Biturajac, Mia ; Jurjako, Marko Važnost pojma štete u raspravi o mentalnim poremećajima // Arhe, 19 (2022), 37; 341-361. doi: 10.19090/arhe.2022.37.341-361

Podaci o odgovornosti

Biturajac, Mia ; Jurjako, Marko

hrvatski

Važnost pojma štete u raspravi o mentalnim poremećajima

The notion of harm is frequently used in the discussion of the nature of mental disorder. Harm also plays important roles in the prominent diagnostic manuals such as DSM and ICD. Recently, however, Cristina Amoretti and Elisabetta Lalumera have questioned the idea that harm should be a necessary constituent of mental disorders. They argue that the notion of harm is underspecified and potentially leads to false negatives in diagnosing mental disorders. Given that harm plays significant roles in medical diagnosis and treatment indicates that we should be reluctant to remove it as a criterion for deciding whether some condition is a mental disorder. Instead, we argue that harm should be understood in the prudential sense and harm in this sense provides a way of responding to worries raised by Amoretti and Lalumera, while staying true to the conception of harm that is relevant for psychiatric practice.

mentalni poremećaj ; prudencijalna šteta ; rastrojenost ; šteta

nije evidentirano

engleski

The importance of the concept of harm in the discussion of mental disorders

nije evidentirano

mental disorder ; prudential damage ; distress ; damage

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

19 (37)

2022.

341-361

objavljeno

1820-0958

nije evidentirano

10.19090/arhe.2022.37.341-361

Povezanost rada

Filozofija

Poveznice
Indeksiranost