Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers (CROSBI ID 312784)

Prilog u časopisu | pregledni rad (znanstveni) | međunarodna recenzija

Symanzik, Cara ; Weinert, Patricia ; Babić, Željka ; Hallmann, Sarah ; Havmose, S Martin ; Johansen, D Jeanne ; Kezic, Sanja ; Macan, Marija ; Macan, Jelena ; Strahwald Julia et al. Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers // International journal of environmental research and public health, 19 (2022), 13; 7588, 25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137588

Podaci o odgovornosti

Symanzik, Cara ; Weinert, Patricia ; Babić, Željka ; Hallmann, Sarah ; Havmose, S Martin ; Johansen, D Jeanne ; Kezic, Sanja ; Macan, Marija ; Macan, Jelena ; Strahwald Julia ; Turk, Rajka ; van der Molen, F Henk ; John, M Swen ; Uter, Wolfgang

engleski

Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers

The safety assessment of cosmetics considers the exposure of a ‘common consumer’, not the occupational exposure of hairdressers. This review aims to compile and appraise evidence regarding the skin toxicity of cysteamine hydrochloride (cysteamine HCl ; CAS no. 156-57-0), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP ; CAS no. 9003-39-8), PVP copolymers (CAS no. 28211-18-9), sodium laureth sulfate (SLES ; CAS no. 9004-82-4), cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA ; CAS no. 68603-42-9), and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB ; CAS no. 61789- 40-0). A total of 298 articles were identified, of which 70 were included. Meta-analysis revealed that hairdressers have a 1.7-fold increased risk of developing a contact allergy to CAPB compared to controls who are not hairdressers. Hairdressers might have a higher risk of acquiring quantum sensitization against cysteamine HCl compared to a consumer because of their job responsibilities. Regarding cocamide DEA, the irritant potential of this surfactant should not be overlooked. Original articles for PVP, PVP copolymers, and SLES are lacking. This systematic review indicates that the current standards do not effectively address the occupational risks associated with hairdressers’ usage of hair cosmetics. The considerable irritant and/or allergenic potential of substances used in hair cosmetics should prompt a reassessment of current risk assessment practices.

cysteamine hydrochloride ; cocamide diethanolamine ; cocamidopropyl betaine ; cosmetics ; hairdresser ; hairdressing ; hand eczema ; polyvinylpyrrolidone ; polyvinylpyrrolidone copolymers ; sodium laureth sulfate

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

19 (13)

2022.

7588

25

objavljeno

1660-4601

10.3390/ijerph19137588

Povezanost rada

Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita, Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost