engleski

Trustworthy artificial intelligence and its use by law enforcement authorities: where do we stand?

From all kinds of industry, communication, education, banking, government, service, manufacturing, medical, and more, artificial intelligence (hereinafter: AI) applications may be found in many sectors of our life. Public safety and criminal justice are gaining advantages thanks to artificial intelligence. For example, traffic safety systems detect infractions and alert authorities. AI is also assisting in the identification of criminals. AI is being studied in a variety of ways as a public safety resource. Face recognition is becoming a popular AI application that may be found in both the public and private sectors. For law enforcement authorities, AI applications boost efficiency, promote data-driven processes, and extend capabilities. AI technology can help law enforcement agencies make judgments and complete tasks in general. They can strengthen data-driven procedures, increase efficiency, or extend capabilities for specific activities or choices. However, recognized human rights as adjudicated by European Convention of Human Rights are calling for caution in the development and usage of AI within the European Union. Fair Trials and 114 civil society organizations have launched a collective statement to call for an Artificial Intelligence Act which foregrounds fundamental rights in November 2021. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI from 2019 are underlining how it is necessary to develop, deploy and use AI systems in a way that adheres to the ethical principles of: respect for human autonomy, prevention of harm, fairness and explicability. European Parliament Resolution of 6 October 2021 on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters has been passed. In this article the authors will analyze this Resoluting taking into accounts principles set in Ethical Guidelines and human rights concerns.

artificial intelligence ; analysis ; law enforcement authorities ; human rights ; ethical guidelines ; EU Resolution and Regulation on AI

nije evidentirano