Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Usefulness of item response latencies in separating self-enhancement from impression management (CROSBI ID 327924)

Prilog u časopisu | ostalo | međunarodna recenzija

Parmač Kovačić, Maja Usefulness of item response latencies in separating self-enhancement from impression management // Current psychology, (2021), doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02375-2

Podaci o odgovornosti

Parmač Kovačić, Maja

engleski

Usefulness of item response latencies in separating self-enhancement from impression management

According to Paulhus (2002), socially desirable responding (SDR) can be separated into unconscious self-enhancement (SE) and conscious impression management (IM), which both appear in two content domains (egoistic and moralistic). Previous studies testing the possibility to separate SE from IM were based solely on SDR scales, whose construct validity is questionable. This study used a new methodological approach – response latencies to personality questionnaire items, to test whether it is possible to separate two forms of SDR in two content domains. A sample of students (N = 206) filled-in a five-factor personality questionnaire in three motivational situations: honest responding, induced egoistic and induced moralistic bias. In addition, every participant was rated on the same questionnaire by four close peers. The possibility of separating SE from IM was tested by comparing latencies for responses indicating SE and IM with honest responses, as well as by direct comparison of latencies for responses indicating two types of SDR. Responses indicating SE, IM and honest responding were determined directly, using discrepancies between personality self-reports in different motivational situations and other- ratings that represented “true” personality traits. Results confirmed the possibility to differentiate SE from IM—while the latencies of responses indicating honest responding and SE did not differ, the latencies for responses indicating IM were significantly longer than latencies for the remaining two types of responses. These results confirm Paulus’s assumption about two separate forms of SDR (unconscious and conscious SDR), as well as the possibility of using latency times for detection of IM on personality questionnaires.

response latency time ; impression management ; self-enhancement ; honest responding ; egoistic/moralistic bias ; personality questionnaires

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

nije evidentirano

2021.

rani pristup (online first)

1046-1310

1936-4733

10.1007/s12144-021-02375-2

Povezanost rada

Psihologija

Poveznice
Indeksiranost