Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (CROSBI ID 299180)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Ščepanović, Rea ; Labib, Krishma ; Buljan, Ivan ; Tijdink, Joeri ; Marušić, Ana Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review // Science and engineering ethics, 27 (2021), 1; 4, 20. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Podaci o odgovornosti

Ščepanović, Rea ; Labib, Krishma ; Buljan, Ivan ; Tijdink, Joeri ; Marušić, Ana

engleski

Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review

Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.

Research ethics ; Research funding organisations ; Research integrity ; Research integrity practices ; Research integrity promotion ; Research performing organisations

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

27 (1)

2021.

4

20

objavljeno

1353-3452

10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Povezanost rada

Integrativna bioetika (prirodne, tehničke, biomedicina i zdravstvo, biotehničke, društvene, humanističke znanosti)

Poveznice
Indeksiranost