Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi !

Reporting of activated thromboplastin time (aPTT): Could we achieve better comparability of the results? (CROSBI ID 298492)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Bronić, Ana ; Margetić, Sandra ; Coen Herak, Desiree ; Milić, Marija ; Krešić, Branka ; Radišić Biljak, Vanja ; Leniček Krleža, Jasna Reporting of activated thromboplastin time (aPTT): Could we achieve better comparability of the results? // Biochemia medica, 31 (2021), 2; 020708, 7. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.020708

Podaci o odgovornosti

Bronić, Ana ; Margetić, Sandra ; Coen Herak, Desiree ; Milić, Marija ; Krešić, Branka ; Radišić Biljak, Vanja ; Leniček Krleža, Jasna

engleski

Reporting of activated thromboplastin time (aPTT): Could we achieve better comparability of the results?

Introduction: Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is determined and reported as clotting time in seconds aPTT(s), but it is presumed that reporting results as patient-to- normal clotting time ratio, aPTT(r), could minimize within- laboratory variability. The aim of study was to investigate differences in reporting aPTT results that can affect comparability of the results among Croatian laboratories and suggest further steps for its harmonization. Materials and methods: The questionnaire on aPTT reporting practice was distributed to 83 laboratories through Survey Monkey application in March 2019 as the part of the first regular round of Croatian Centre for Quality Assessment in Laboratory Medicine proficiency testing. Results: The survey response rate was 0.49. Majority of laboratories report aPTT results as both, seconds and ratio. Participants reported use of 23 different aPTT(s) reference intervals along with 17 different combinations of reagent/coagulometer and 25 aPTT(s) denominators of different origin for aPTT(r) calculation. Despite the same aPTT(s) results, the use of different denominators caused a dispersion of aPTT(r) results that can lead to exceeding external quality assessment performance criteria of 7%, particularly when results were compared for the same reagent group only. By applying aPTT(s) reference interval mean as denominator for calculation of aPTT(r) reference interval better concordance to harmonized one was obtained (17 vs. 27 ; χ2 = 3.972 ; P = 0.046). Conclusion: In order to improve comparability of the results, laboratories are advised to use mean of aPTT(s) reference interval as denominator for aPTT(r) calculation. Type of coagulometer need to be considered when evaluating aPTT proficiency test results and its currently acceptable limit of performance evaluated accordingly.

activated partial thromboplastin time ; external quality assessment ; harmonization

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

31 (2)

2021.

020708

7

objavljeno

1330-0962

1846-7482

10.11613/BM.2021.020708

Povezanost rada

Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita, Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost