engleski

Civilisational and anti-civilisational conflicts

In this article, the authors argue in favour of their principal thesis about anticivilizational conflicts, contending with the theses about the “clash of civilisations” presented by Samuel Huntington in 1996. Their goal is to identify a new paradigm and the modern implications of civilizational conflicts, or clashes of civilisations, as well as to redefine the notion of anti-civilizational conflicts, or conflicts within civilisations, which have become an important determinant of the state of modern western and eastern civilisations. The political environment that has shaped the new global order after the Cold War in the 1990s, and especially the attack on World Trade Center in New York on 11 September 2001 and the ensuing events, ushered in a new era of political, social and economic relations. The West is undergoing social processes that have been eroding its homogeneity for decades, primarily in the economic and national sense. The East, on the other hand, faces an increasingly obvious lack of religious homogeneity, and permanent wars. Globalisation, in addition to the migration crisis, is instrumental in generating new conflicts. Clashes between civilisations continue, but instead of conventional warfare, mass migration that directly affects the state of the western civilisation becomes the weapon of choice. The dominant globalist economic policy of corporate capitalism underpins it all. The anti-civilizational conflict, where a civilisation is eroding its own homogeneity, is taking place side by side with the clash of civilisations.

clash of civilisations, anti-civilisation conflict, new paradigm, globalization, immigration

nije evidentirano