Nalazite se na CroRIS probnoj okolini. Ovdje evidentirani podaci neće biti pohranjeni u Informacijskom sustavu znanosti RH. Ako je ovo greška, CroRIS produkcijskoj okolini moguće je pristupi putem poveznice www.croris.hr
izvor podataka: crosbi

Cost effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs and treatment guidelines (CROSBI ID 295369)

Prilog u časopisu | izvorni znanstveni rad | međunarodna recenzija

Kučan, Marta ; Lulić, Igor ; Mršić Pelčić, Jasenka ; Mozetič, Vladimir ; Vitezić, Dinko Cost effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs and treatment guidelines // European journal of clinical pharmacology, 77 (2021), 1665-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03163-4

Podaci o odgovornosti

Kučan, Marta ; Lulić, Igor ; Mršić Pelčić, Jasenka ; Mozetič, Vladimir ; Vitezić, Dinko

engleski

Cost effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs and treatment guidelines

Purpose Arterial hypertension (AH) is associated with a high economic burden for the individual patient and for society in general. The study evaluates antihypertensives and their cost-effectiveness, comparing diuretics (D), beta-blockers (B), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin- II receptor blockers (A) and calcium channel blockers (C) with no intervention (NI). Methods The study included five health states in a Markov model. Cost values included average cost of the drugs used, treatment in hospital and treatment in general practice (collected from Croatian Health Insurance Fund). The study was conducted separately for 65-year old men and women, with an initial probability of cardiovascular death risk of 2% and heart failure risk of 1%. The results were presented in terms of increase in QALYs and associated financial savings or costs in euros (€). Results Results for men (compared with NI): treatment with D resulted in a QALY increase of 0.76 and €886 in savings, treatment with C in an increase of 0.74 QALYs and €767 in savings, treatment with A in an increase of 0.69 QALYs and €834 in savings, treatment with B resulted in an increase of 0.40 QALYs, but with an additional cost of €41. Results for women (compared with NI): treatment with D resulted in an increase of 0.93 QALYs and €987 in savings, treatment with C in an increase of 0.89 QALYs and savings of €855, treatment with A in an increase of 0.86 QALYs and savings of €991, treatment with B in an increase of 0.48 QALYs, but with an additional cost of €148. Conclusions Treatment of AH with D, C and A is cost effective compared with the no-intervention scenario. Diuretics are the most cost-effective first-line treatment. The scenario with beta- blockers resulted in additional QALY when compared with no intervention, but also additional costs ; therefore, based on our results, this therapy would not be recommended as first-line treatment.

antihypertensive drugs ; cost-effectiveness analysis ; therapeutic guidelines

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

nije evidentirano

Podaci o izdanju

77

2021.

1665-1672

objavljeno

0031-6970

1432-1041

10.1007/s00228-021-03163-4

Povezanost rada

Farmacija, Kliničke medicinske znanosti

Poveznice
Indeksiranost