Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 112907

Propusnost i učinkovitost nesignaliziranih raskrižja i kružnih raskrižja - usporedna analiza


Hristoski, Jovan T.; Tollazzi, Tomaž
Propusnost i učinkovitost nesignaliziranih raskrižja i kružnih raskrižja - usporedna analiza // Suvremeni Promet, 23 (2003), 1-2; 66-70 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, prethodno priopćenje, stručni)


Naslov
Propusnost i učinkovitost nesignaliziranih raskrižja i kružnih raskrižja - usporedna analiza
(Capacity and Performances of Unsignalized Intersections and Roundabouts - Comparative Analysis)

Autori
Hristoski, Jovan T. ; Tollazzi, Tomaž

Izvornik
Suvremeni Promet (0351-1898) 23 (2003), 1-2; 66-70

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, prethodno priopćenje, stručni

Ključne riječi
nesemaforizirana križanja; kružna raskrižja; metodologije za analizu propusnosti; usporedna analiza
(unsignalized intersections; roundabouts; capacity analysis methodologies; comparative analysis)

Sažetak
The study is investigating how large differences are beetween three capacity analysis methodoligies (Highway Capacity Manual 2000, SIDRA and Richtlinien fuer die Anlagen von Strassen - RAS) for two types of leveled unsignalized intersections: two-way STOP controlled and roundabouts and compare them. The research has to accomplish evaluation of the capacity and the basic leveled unsignalized intersections performances - measures of effectiveness (degree os saturation, delay) according to the three different capacity methodologies, to determine and analyze the result differences between the methodoligies for two-way STOP controlled intersections and the differences between the methodologies when, as an alternative reconstruction solutiond, roundabouts are suggested. The analysis of field research results on two selected intersections and their alternative roundabout reconstruction solutions in Slovenia are presented, using adequate software for mentioned methodologies: HiCAP 1.0.0., aaSIDRA 2.0 and our own program for RAS. The average differences between methodologies are analyzed and compared for both types of intersections.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Tehnologija prometa i transport



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekt / tema
0193010

Ustanove
Institut prometa i veza, Zagreb

Citiraj ovu publikaciju

Hristoski, Jovan T.; Tollazzi, Tomaž
Propusnost i učinkovitost nesignaliziranih raskrižja i kružnih raskrižja - usporedna analiza // Suvremeni Promet, 23 (2003), 1-2; 66-70 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, prethodno priopćenje, stručni)
Hristoski, J. & Tollazzi, T. (2003) Propusnost i učinkovitost nesignaliziranih raskrižja i kružnih raskrižja - usporedna analiza. Suvremeni Promet, 23 (1-2), 66-70.
@article{article, year = {2003}, pages = {66-70}, keywords = {unsignalized intersections, roundabouts, capacity analysis methodologies, comparative analysis}, journal = {Suvremeni Promet}, volume = {23}, number = {1-2}, issn = {0351-1898}, title = {Capacity and Performances of Unsignalized Intersections and Roundabouts - Comparative Analysis}, keyword = {unsignalized intersections, roundabouts, capacity analysis methodologies, comparative analysis} }

Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka:


  • TRIS
  • CAB
  • CEOBASE
  • IRRD
  • DOC